请问一下投稿被Crosscheck查出来31%，编辑要求回应，该如何应对
之前投稿1个月给回大修，修改后返回编辑，又两个星期发来信小修，但是里面除了审稿人的意见之外还写了这样一段话：
In addition, as you are aware, ACS is screening all manuscripts against the CrossCheck Database. As a result of this process we have received a similarity index greater than 30% for your manuscript. The iThenticate summary report obtained for your manuscript is attached. In particular, there are several statements in your manuscript that are verbatim text from: XXX., et al. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 20XX, XX, XX
之后查看了附件里面写了Similarity Index ：31%
看了一下，编辑提到的那篇有5%，都是在introduction的背景介绍里面
剩下的若干都是<1%的 有好多都是什么试剂名称或者仪器名称的啊，比如"1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC, Sigma, USA) and N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, Sigma, USA)"又或者是"Samples were measured by dynamic light scattering with a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Malvern, UK)"，
还有一些方法学的部分，一些诸如HPLC的流速以及检测波长。。。很无语
另外还有一些就让我哭笑不得了，包括" Statistical analysis was performed using Student's T-test or one -way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test"这样的句子，以及在图表下方的“Data were expressed as Mean ± S.D. , *P<0.05 vs CON group, #P<0.05 vs XXX group”，这样的也会被认为重复抄袭部分。
请问各位虫友这种情况应该怎样修改呢，我是主要修改一下前面的5%的部分，还是说所有查出来的部分都要修改呢，然后回给编辑又要怎样说明呢，会不会直接就被毙掉了 。。。谢谢各位虫友了！
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
直接说明真实情况，不要隐瞒，主要是哪些地方的重复原因，一些能修改的地方修改一下
这种情况被拒的可能有多大。。。
我的回复
Dear Prof·····,
We would like to express our sincere apologies to have so many overlapped descriptions in our manuscript, and we also really appreciate that you give us the opportunity to make explanation. We have provided the explanations in the following paragraph and revised the manuscript to avoid overlapped sentences with our previous papers. The revised parts have been highlighted in the submitted manuscript.
Firstly, we would like to emphasize that this work is novel and different from our previous work and literature reports, which has been demonstrated by the positive comments from peer-reviewers. We also believed it has significant scientific impacts to be published in JPCC. For the overlapped descriptions, our reasons are as followed.
1. The major overlapped descriptions are in the experimental parts. ····························
2. Another major overlapped parts are the affiliation and acknowledgment which is the same as our previous published paper······························. This is inevitable, because we are still working in the same university and supported by the same funding programs.
3. The others overlapped parts are minor, and mainly on the technical languages, such as ·······························
4. The fixed phrases of physical symbol annotations were overlapped, for example, ···································
给满分我吧，
说清楚了，不会被拒。
谢谢了，我老板说是他的失误，然后他写了信 但是我看到里面他直接承认了，这么写妥当么
We found that the major body of overlapped descriptions occurred in the Introduction Section. One important reference “XXX et al. XXX Title XXX. 20XX; X:17XX-XX.” has not been included in the reference list and a large number of sentences were directly copied from this paper. We sincerely apology for the serious and plain-fact mistake. We have revised this paragraph to avoid the reproduction.
重复这么多，胆子不小阿……俺不看解释……那还只有二十六个字母呢