应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 请问一下投稿被Crosscheck查出来31%，编辑要求回应，该如何应对
51/1返回列表
查看: 7220  |  回复: 18
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zasxcdcd

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 请问一下投稿被Crosscheck查出来31%，编辑要求回应，该如何应对已有12人参与

之前投稿1个月给回大修，修改后返回编辑，又两个星期发来信小修，但是里面除了审稿人的意见之外还写了这样一段话：
In addition, as you are aware, ACS is screening all manuscripts against the CrossCheck Database. As a result of this process we have received a similarity index greater than 30% for your manuscript. The iThenticate summary report obtained for your manuscript is attached. In particular, there are several statements in your manuscript that are verbatim text from: XXX., et al. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 20XX, XX, XX

之后查看了附件里面写了Similarity Index ：31%
看了一下，编辑提到的那篇有5%，都是在introduction的背景介绍里面
剩下的若干都是<1%的 有好多都是什么试剂名称或者仪器名称的啊，比如"1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC, Sigma,  USA)  and N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, Sigma,  USA)"又或者是"Samples were measured by dynamic light scattering with a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Malvern, UK)"，
还有一些方法学的部分，一些诸如HPLC的流速以及检测波长。。。很无语
另外还有一些就让我哭笑不得了，包括" Statistical analysis was performed using Student's T-test or  one  -way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test"这样的句子，以及在图表下方的“Data were  expressed  as Mean  ± S.D. , *P<0.05 vs CON group, #P<0.05 vs XXX  group”，这样的也会被认为重复抄袭部分。
请问各位虫友这种情况应该怎样修改呢，我是主要修改一下前面的5%的部分，还是说所有查出来的部分都要修改呢，然后回给编辑又要怎样说明呢，会不会直接就被毙掉了 。。。谢谢各位虫友了！
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

志存高远 自强不息

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2014-11-17 10:07:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zasxcdcd

金虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 自私的猫1988 at 2014-11-17 10:12:31
直接说明真实情况，不要隐瞒，主要是哪些地方的重复原因，一些能修改的地方修改一下

这种情况被拒的可能有多大。。。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2014-11-17 11:01:26
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励参与交流~ 2014-11-17 13:52:18
直接说明真实情况，不要隐瞒，主要是哪些地方的重复原因，一些能修改的地方修改一下
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2014-11-17 10:12:31
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

klmopq

木虫 (小有名气)
★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
book2005593: 金币+2, 鼓励交流~ 2014-11-17 13:52:39
小木虫: 金币+2, 帖子真精彩 2014-11-23 16:25:33
我的回复
Dear Prof·····,

We would like to express our sincere apologies to have so many overlapped descriptions in our manuscript, and we also really appreciate that you give us the opportunity to make explanation. We have provided the explanations in the following paragraph and revised the manuscript to avoid overlapped sentences with our previous papers. The revised parts have been highlighted in the submitted manuscript.

Firstly, we would like to emphasize that this work is novel and different from our previous work and literature reports, which has been demonstrated by the positive comments from peer-reviewers. We also believed it has significant scientific impacts to be published in JPCC. For the overlapped descriptions, our reasons are as followed.

1.        The major overlapped descriptions are in the experimental parts. ····························
2.        Another major overlapped parts are the affiliation and acknowledgment which is the same as our previous published paper······························. This is inevitable, because we are still working in the same university and supported by the same funding programs.
3.        The others overlapped parts are minor, and mainly on the technical languages, such as ·······························
4.        The fixed phrases of physical symbol annotations were overlapped, for example, ···································
给满分我吧！！！
赞一下(25人) 回复此楼
4楼2014-11-17 11:15:41
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

klmopq

木虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by zasxcdcd at 2014-11-17 11:01:26
这种情况被拒的可能有多大。。。...

说清楚了，不会被拒。
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2014-11-17 14:30:09
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 19 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭