24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1611  |  回复: 8
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xiaoruoqiu

铜虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 求高手翻译一段英文资料(英译中)

如题,求高手指点。
Cigarette smoke contains more than 4000 individual constituents and damages most of the organs in the body. Our understanding of the mechanistic relationships between exposure to these individual constituents and the diseases produced by inhalation of whole smoke is incomplete, and efforts to estimate individual disease risks from known constituent levels and toxicity under-predict the level of risk that occurs with smoking . Furthermore, reduction of any one chemical or class of chemicals will not necessarily lead to a reduction in disease risk, and the magnitude of chemical reduction needed to produce a substantive change in disease risk remains uncertain.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

carrieskl

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
xiaoruoqiu: 金币+10 2013-04-22 11:25:59
hanches: 金币+2, 欢迎一起探讨问题哈~BB奖励~ 2013-04-22 19:14:50
Cigarette smoke contains more than 4000 individual constituents and damages most of the organs in the body.
香烟烟雾中含有4000多种化学成分,这对人体中的大部分器官都有伤害。
Our understanding of the mechanistic relationships between exposure to these individual constituents and the diseases produced by inhalation of whole smoke is incomplete, and efforts to estimate individual disease risks from known constituent levels and toxicity under-predict the level of risk that occurs with smoking .
我们对暴露于单独化学成分和吸入全部烟所导致的疾病的关系的理解尚不完全,并且努力用已知成分含量和毒性预测吸烟的风险水平来估计个体疾病风险。(我总觉得and后面的句子语法有问题。。)
Furthermore, reduction of any one chemical or class of chemicals will not necessarily lead to a reduction in disease risk, and the magnitude of chemical reduction needed to produce a substantive change in disease risk remains uncertain.
此外,减少任意一种或一类化学物质都不一定能够降低患病风险,并且使患病风险发生实质性改变所需减少的化学物质的具体含量尚不明确。
争做医生中最好的厨子
5楼2013-04-20 23:50:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

liusongcid

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
香烟中含有4000多独立成分和损害人体内大部分器官。我们理解的机理关于暴露于这些个别成分和整个烟吸入所产生的疾病之间的关系是不完整的,从已知的成分浓度升高和毒性估计个别疾病的努力风险预测发生与吸烟的风险水平发生。此外,任何一种或一类化学物质的减少并不一定会导致疾病的风险减少,化学减少的幅度需要产生实质性的变化,疾病的风险仍然不明朗。
carlos
2楼2013-04-20 22:27:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaoruoqiu

铜虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by liusongcid at 2013-04-20 22:27:16
香烟中含有4000多独立成分和损害人体内大部分器官。我们理解的机理关于暴露于这些个别成分和整个烟吸入所产生的疾病之间的关系是不完整的,从已知的成分浓度升高和毒性估计个别疾病的努力风险预测发生与吸烟的风险水 ...

您是在逗我玩儿么,我要是用谷歌翻译还跑这儿来干嘛
3楼2013-04-20 22:50:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Rio2016

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
xiaoruoqiu: 金币+10 2013-04-22 11:25:48
hanches: 金币+2, 感谢应助,BB奖励下,欢迎常来~~~ 2013-04-22 19:14:27
Cigarette smoke contains more than 4000 individual constituents and damages most of the organs in the body.
香烟烟雾中含有4000多种成分,它会损害人体大部分器官。
Our understanding of the mechanistic relationships between exposure to these individual constituents and the diseases produced by inhalation of whole smoke is incomplete, and efforts to estimate individual disease risks from known constituent levels and toxicity under-predict the level of risk that occurs with smoking .
我们对暴露于这些单独成分中和通过吸入全烟(含全部成分的)所导致疾病之间的作用关系还不完全了解。
Furthermore, reduction of any one chemical or class of chemicals will not necessarily lead to a reduction in disease risk, and the magnitude of chemical reduction needed to produce a substantive change in disease risk remains uncertain.
此外,减少一种化合物或一类化合物并不一定能降低发病风险,并且仍不能确定多大的化合物减少量才能对发病风险产生一个实质性的变化。

睡觉了、、、
寥寥数年、将就过活
4楼2013-04-20 23:15:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +3 DpSrDtM079iu 2026-08-22 5/250 2026-08-23 04:07 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[论文投稿] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-22 5/250 2026-08-23 03:52 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-22 6/300 2026-08-23 03:40 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[基金申请] 2026国自然函评费到账 +11 羊腰板 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-22 22:03 by lsbin3733
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +8 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 16:30 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +16 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-22 16:12 by 阿布Abu
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 23:51 by cratir
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +16 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 20/1000 2026-08-21 21:13 by Ldrop2023
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +13 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-21 17:21 by 紫杉醇
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +11 大萍1987 2026-08-20 13/650 2026-08-21 14:48 by 20120902066
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 8/400 2026-08-21 12:31 by 酷酷墨镜
[论文投稿] 投稿咨询 +5 wwm09 2026-08-17 7/350 2026-08-21 10:11 by 期刊论文帮手
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +18 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 23/1150 2026-08-20 17:19 by Godzela
[基金申请] 重要消息,中午系统在维护 +11 yuleib84 2026-08-18 12/600 2026-08-20 11:09 by xskun
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +14 布布和一二 2026-08-19 15/750 2026-08-19 18:07 by gltch
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
信息提示
请填处理意见