投的日本期刊IJAEM，经历了长达6个月的等待后，审稿意见终于回来了，有两条看不太懂，求助大家，谢谢

1. The authors should explicitly state
where their results are original, which advancement of knowledge they are obtaining and why this knowledge is of relevance· This must be clear immediately in the abstract, then described in the introduction and confirmed in the conclusions

2. the use of references is episodic and one does not understand in which line of research the authors placed themselves or if the started a new one

 返回小木虫查看更多