24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2524  |  回复: 31
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者yilicoco将赠送您 100 个金币

yilicoco

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求助,审稿意见不太明白 已有6人参与

投的日本期刊IJAEM,经历了长达6个月的等待后,审稿意见终于回来了,有两条看不太懂,求助大家,谢谢

1. The authors should explicitly state
where their results are original, which advancement of knowledge they are obtaining and why this knowledge is of relevance· This must be clear immediately in the abstract, then described in the introduction and confirmed in the conclusions

2. the use of references is episodic and one does not understand in which line of research the authors placed themselves or if the started a new one

发自小木虫IOS客户端
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
1. The authors should explicitly state
where their results are original, which advancement of knowledge they are obtaining and why this knowledge is of relevance· This must be clear immediately in the abstract, then described in the introduction and confirmed in the conclusions。

审稿人建议楼主在摘要中必须阐明原创的结果有哪些,在相关研究领域取得了什么研究进展。在引用中需要通过比较说明所做研究的价值,而在结论中要把摘要中的结论再确认一次。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

咱也是有组织的人了...
4楼2017-05-28 14:07:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yilicoco

新虫 (小有名气)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2017-05-28 15:37:56
2. the use of references is episodic and one does not understand in which line of research the authors placed themselves or if the started a new one

大意是说,参考文献的引用没有章法。...

看的出审稿人觉得参考文献有问题,可是他说的感觉不清楚,不明白该如何修改。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
9楼2017-05-28 15:39:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

yilicoco

新虫 (小有名气)

2楼2017-05-28 13:01:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sohell

新虫 (初入文坛)

3楼2017-05-28 13:35:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yilicoco

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by sohell at 2017-05-28 13:35:25
这不很好翻译吗

求指教

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2017-05-28 14:34:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yilicoco

新虫 (小有名气)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2017-05-28 14:07:08
1. The authors should explicitly state
where their results are original, which advancement of knowledge they are obtaining and why this knowledge is of relevance· This must be clear immediately in  ...

谢谢,请教一下,第二个是什么意思

发自小木虫IOS客户端
6楼2017-05-28 14:36:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yilicoco

新虫 (小有名气)

7楼2017-05-28 15:29:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by yilicoco at 2017-05-28 14:36:45
谢谢,请教一下,第二个是什么意思
...

2. the use of references is episodic and one does not understand in which line of research the authors placed themselves or if the started a new one

大意是说,参考文献的引用没有章法。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

咱也是有组织的人了...
8楼2017-05-28 15:37:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yilicoco

新虫 (小有名气)

10楼2017-05-28 18:32:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yilicoco 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见