求助，审稿意见不太明白
投的日本期刊IJAEM，经历了长达6个月的等待后，审稿意见终于回来了，有两条看不太懂，求助大家，谢谢
1. The authors should explicitly state
where their results are original, which advancement of knowledge they are obtaining and why this knowledge is of relevance· This must be clear immediately in the abstract, then described in the introduction and confirmed in the conclusions
2. the use of references is episodic and one does not understand in which line of research the authors placed themselves or if the started a new one
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
求助啊
这不很好翻译吗
1. The authors should explicitly state
where their results are original, which advancement of knowledge they are obtaining and why this knowledge is of relevance· This must be clear immediately in the abstract, then described in the introduction and confirmed in the conclusions。
审稿人建议楼主在摘要中必须阐明原创的结果有哪些，在相关研究领域取得了什么研究进展。在引用中需要通过比较说明所做研究的价值，而在结论中要把摘要中的结论再确认一次。
求指教啊
2. the use of references is episodic and one does not understand in which line of research the authors placed themselves or if the started a new one
大意是说，参考文献的引用没有章法
，