论文审稿意见有这么几条：
1. The Pearson correlations presented in Table 5 do not show significant correlations between OM and the four metals in soils/sediments (lines 258-260). In Figure 3, the sequential extraction results show that a major fraction of copper (Cu) resides within the organic matter fraction of the soils/sediments. The Pearson correlation between OM and Cu therefore is misleading.
2. Only Pearson Correlations are reported. There are others such as the goodness of fit (F-test) of the multivariate model and significance of the coefficients (including interaction terms between independent variables). The conclusions based on the analysis provided are not strong: for example, the data show that a major fraction of the copper resides in the organic matter matrix of the soils/sediments, but the Pearson correlation between OM and Cu is not significant.
The authors have a choice to exclude their statistical analysis.
这该如何回复？论文中有些土壤/底泥物理化学参数，以及其重金属含量，如何对他们进行F-test或者其他显著性检验呢，谢谢！
（注：第二条中说的是OM形态在铜含量中是主要的形态，但是OM和铜总含量的相关性并不是很明显，所以审稿人说我这样的结果是有误导性的） 返回小木虫查看更多