本人小博一枚。投稿3月终于迎来意见，一个几乎无意见，一个提一堆意见，且比较尖锐。
  摘录如下：
  1、As very important parts in the manuscript, the '** technology' and '*** measurement' were not carefully organized, the existing descriptions could not make it clear without any example in this theory part. More detailed should be given here.
2、The experiment and conclusion parts also suffer from the simple introduction problem. The details of the experiment process should be given and discussed, rather than the simple table and figures (Figure 7 is vague, and Figure 8 does not give any related information to the experiment). The conclusion part should be rewritten to address the real work and new findings of this research, not just give a simple summary.
3、In page 9, do you have the input data for this experiment? And the results? Also, how do you conclude that the performance of this platform meets the requirement of 3D data acquisition for digital city modelling?

论文介绍:
   本论文主要介绍一个集成系统，主要介绍国内外进展、系统组成、数据处理技术、实验案例和结论感谢啥的。其中 '** technology' and '*** measurement'等 是其中几个关键技术和算法，但审稿人提出这些技术和算法连贯性不清晰，需让人了解为何如此组织，我已在introduction中加入数据处理流程，并说明这些技术和算法在其中哪个环节使用。
   针对上面几个问题，我不知从哪个方面回答，敬请指教。
  1、 '** technology' and '*** measurement'  仅仅是算法，怎么给出例子证明? 系统是综合性的，实验案例是整体精度分析。该怎么回复审稿人？
  2、实验细节我已描述实验区域，实验过程\评价标准和统计结果，还要怎么给出实验细节？问题3与问题2是一个部分，输入数据就是50个测试点，总不能将点位都列入吧，文中已提到选择测试点的基本要求；统计结果中显示精度能满足 3D data acquisition要求。还要怎么回答？

其他：
   1、审稿人提出我论文表述不够英语化，其实我已找enpaper进行过论文修订，我计划再找该杂志推荐的论文修订来再做一次，不知是否有必要，或能增加中稿率。谢谢。

我该如何改正或回复审稿人。
  本人初次投Sci，生怕回复不到位被拒，求大神指点。
不胜感谢。 返回小木虫查看更多