Catalysis Communications的投稿问题
前几天向Catalysis Communications投了一篇文章，技术审查不合格被打回来了~其中有一个问题是说参考文献的格式不合格，意见是这样的“Reference list should be prepared strictly according to the Guide for Authors. For journal articles, starting page number should be provided instead of page span.”
这个意见是不是说对于期刊文章应给出起始页码而不是页码范围？但是，我看Catalysis Communications上已发表文章中的参考文献都是给的页码范围啊！
问一下哪位虫友遇到过类似问题？我该怎么办和怎么修改呢？不胜感激！！
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
他的意思就是只要给出起始页码，不用给出页码范围了。
谢谢您了，那我就按照他的意思改就行了吗？但是此杂志上发表文章的参考文献好像都是页码范围，我还用不用再写信问一下啊？
上杂志主页看了一下，应该是要给出页码范围的：
Reference style
Text: Indicate references by number(s) in square brackets in line with the text. The actual authors can be referred to, but the reference number(s) must always be given.
Example: '..... as demonstrated [3,6]. Barnaby and Jones [8] obtained a different result ....'
List: Number the references (numbers in square brackets) in the list in the order in which they appear in the text.
Examples:
Reference to a journal publication:
[1] J. van der Geer, J.A.J. Hanraads, R.A. Lupton, J. Sci. Commun. 163 (2010) 51–59.
Reference to a book:
[2] W. Strunk Jr., E.B. White, The Elements of Style, fourth ed., Longman, New York, 2000.
Reference to a chapter in an edited book:
[3] G.R. Mettam, L.B. Adams, in: B.S. Jones, R.Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the Electronic Age, E-Publishing, Inc. New York, 2009, pp. 281–304.
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /authorinstructions，