二审找了6个审稿人，其中三个反馈回评审意见，都没有直接拒。
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #3: 。。。。。。。。 The strength of the paper is that it presents a substantial body of carefully obtained experimental results that can be of value to expand current fundamental knowledge on these food gel systems. Despite the experimental results, the paper is more descriptive and only vaguely mechanistic. Only weak attempts have been made to draw new insights into this colloidal system.我想应该是这几句话引导主编直接拒稿。
Reviewer #5: 。。。。。。。指出小问题
Reviewer #6: 。。。。。。。。指出小问题
回复此楼
+2/220
