被初审拒稿，第二次被拒，心塞，意见附上
Kindly, it seems that the manuscript has been prepared somehow hastily. There exist points which are not clarified well enough, especially by section 3 and forward, thus making difficult to the reader to recognize the real contribution to the state of the art.
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
加油！
section 3一般是结果与讨论吧，说白了就是认为你实验结果不能支撑你引言中提出的问题，或者结果与讨论太过简单
说白了就是写得很糟糕，让人都容易看不懂，要么是语言糟糕，要么是内容表述逻辑性糟糕找师兄或者老师给把把关吧
，
嗯嗯，多谢，唉，再弄
写的太浪，编辑委婉鼓励拒稿