1个Publish Unaltered,3个Major,1个Reject,最后悲剧啦
投稿ieee tmm,审稿意见:1个publish unaltered,3个major,1个reject,最后ae给活生生拒稿了(理由如下)。
这个是不是也太严格了?是否有重投必要?
--------------------------------------------------------
the manuscript has been checked by five reviewers, most of which were not too excited about it - 1 reject, and 3 major revision ratings. yet, one marked it as 'publish' but did not leave any comments. also, one of the reviewers who gave a 'major' rating stated that he/she is not an expert in this area.
for this reason, i consulted another colleague who i consider a top expert in this domain to have a look at it as well. the colleague also recommended rejection based on the following reasons: .....
[ Last edited by frank0139 on 2019-8-7 at 15:14 ]
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
所以说,审稿人在同意接受的情况下,有意见比没有意见要强
拒得是明明白白,还有啥不服气的
这ae挺负责的
这个一点都不严格:一个直接接收,但没留任何意见,相当于该审稿人自动弃权; 三大修,说明要校正的东西太多;一拒稿,说明文章确实有的不足很可能无法通过校正来实现。
一般来说,只要有一个拒稿,就歇菜了,何况再加三大修,
说的很清楚了,有理有据
直接reject 还是reject and resubmit? 如果是后者,拒稿的意见不是太差而且能解释好的话,好好改也许还有希望。楼主初审花了多长时间?
许多杂志还是一票否决的制度,不过编辑这样回复还是很照顾情绪的,加油,换一个。
看来我还是幸运,我去年三个审稿人