1个Publish Unaltered，3个Major，1个Reject，最后悲剧啦
投稿ieee tmm，审稿意见：1个publish unaltered，3个major，1个reject，最后ae给活生生拒稿了（理由如下）。
这个是不是也太严格了？是否有重投必要？
--------------------------------------------------------
the manuscript has been checked by five reviewers, most of which were not too excited about it - 1 reject, and 3 major revision ratings. yet, one marked it as 'publish' but did not leave any comments. also, one of the reviewers who gave a 'major' rating stated that he/she is not an expert in this area.
for this reason, i consulted another colleague who i consider a top expert in this domain to have a look at it as well. the colleague also recommended rejection based on the following reasons: .....
[ Last edited by frank0139 on 2019-8-7 at 15:14 ]
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
编辑解释的真清晰
没办法，运气太差。挺你的不是专家，是专家的不挺你！
没必要重投了，3个大修，1个拒稿，肯定必拒的。就算3个小修，1个拒，有时都会被毙。
纯匆饧桑绻寄芎芎玫幕赜托薷模耆梢孕薷暮笾赝叮赝兜氖焙蛟赾over letter里列出点对点的回复
，
编辑的回复非常有道理，如果你想拒稿重投，必须打动最后一个审稿人，否则就没有多大意义呀
说得很清楚了
不严格，一般有1个大修就该拒绝了