一审意见是一小修，一大修，一拒。然后编辑主要根据拒稿的那个人的意见来拒的。

不过拒稿的那个审稿人的问题都是比较general的，甚至是主观的。比如：“XPS分峰是主观性比较大的，所以在这里没用。”“TEM拍的时候电子束是会对样品有干扰的，所以没用。”都是这种自以为是的意见。

编辑给出了下面这段话：

Whether or not it will be possible for you to address all of these concerns is not something we can assess at this stage. Indeed, it seems that many further experiments and substantial revision is necessary to establish the significance of your results and the strength of conclusions you draw.

Moreover, it is far from clear whether the work will continue to appear impressive in the light of this additional work.

不知道有过经验的童鞋觉得申述的可能性大吗？

多谢了。 返回小木虫查看更多