JHM两个月被拒，但理由让我迷茫
上午收到编辑拒稿邮件，主要理由是: Most of the results present in the articles are misleading. Aeration is the best and cheap method for the removal of manganese and ferrous ion from water medium. But, in the present study, not only aeration, all the other oxidants are not effective for the removal of both elements.
所有实验结果都没问题，都直接验证了还原条件的优势，我查了大量文章也没人具体讨论过这方面内容，但审稿人说我结果是错的。本来后面我要重点探讨该现象的基理，但现在编辑直接否定了我的研究方向，我该怎么办！
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
求助
转投，祝好！
你确定你看懂审稿意见了？翻译出来听听？
你确定你看懂审稿意见了？翻译出来听听？
Most of the results present in the articles are misleading. Aeration is the best and cheap method for the removal of manganese and ferrous ion from water medium. But, in the present study, not only aeration, all the other oxidants are not effective for the removal of both elements.
慢慢来，一句一句的翻，（我虽然不是这个方向，但是大致能够明白可能是存在什么误会，文章写得时候逻辑错误导致的）
，