当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >这样的审稿意见有必要重投吗?

这样的审稿意见有必要重投吗?

作者 shizishanshang
来源: 小木虫 900 18 举报帖子
+关注

投了一个本领域的老牌杂志,点数不高,只有3点多,但是十几年前就3点多了,是业内的一个比较好的杂志。
审稿意见回来了,一个同意发表,另外一个可能是不同意,主编给据了。
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  The review process resulted in the conclusion that the work might be of interest, but it is not yet ready for publication. Therefore, I must decline the present version of the manuscript from further consideration by XXX. Following extensive revision, and upon addressing all reviewer and editorial comments, you may consider resubmitting the manuscript to Planta. In this case, please provide a covering letter explaining how you addressed each of the comments.

具体审稿意见太多了,没法全贴出来,第一个人是说
....To my opinion, the article can be published in XXX, provided that some changes are made to improve the clearness and strength of the article. This particularly applies to the discussion chapter.
然后是一大堆意见。
第二个审稿人认为我的工作意义不大,不好对付啊。

....The current version of the manuscript is excessively descriptive with several over-speculative statements. The obtained results are interpreted according to the previous findings in adventitious root formation, without highlighting the novelty of the current study. A proper explanation is needed for the mechanism of root induction
然后也是一堆意见。
不过两个人都说我的讨论要加深。 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 挥手寒暄321

    我觉得大修时必要的,重投你要问编辑,如果不行,那就大修投另外一个期刊,既然审稿人说你的工作没有意义,那说明你的文章确实缺少创新点,需要在凝练一下!

  • thdl520

    可以重投,但大修需要抓住论文的重点,在摘要,引言和结论以及cover letter中要突出你工作的意义

  • 纳米材料753

    非常有必要再试试 按审稿人意见好好改

  • ablesci

    第二个人也没有那么negative,其实还行。最重要的是editor没说你novelty不够,只说你做的不够,需要大修。而且open the door for you to re-submit。我觉得如果你能够好好address那些建议的话,你可以考虑做实验,改好全文,然后写好response letter 然后重投。Cover Letter 里要知名投给这个editor。如果你觉得那些意见很难实验室满足,你就换别家,别跟他们玩儿了。因为有写reviewer其实只是好高骛远而已,毕竟嘴巴一张,不用自己做实验,可别人要忙仨月,

  • clarkwzd

    主编都拒了,还投啥,基本没戏

  • 新娅菲

    我的和你的一样,一个同意,一个不同意,编辑让修改重投。已经返回去了,目前还在审稿中。

猜你喜欢