审稿意见回复问题
如题，小弟最近投了一篇EA，做的是超级电容器材料方面的，其中一个审稿人有三条意见说的有点不怎么理解.到底怎么回复呀~
3. The work contains new and original contributions.
4. Any apparent lack of clarity.
5. Any apparent errors of fact or logic.
大家帮小弟想想办法啊~~~
还有个大修的审稿给了一个定义性的问题Reviewer #3. : While reading the manuscript, I would like to advise Editor and Authors that there is strong drive among experts in the area to make proper distinction between battery-type and capacitor-type systems.
The manuscript presents the controversial definitions of the terms related to capacitors/supercapacitors. 像这种应该怎么应答呢????/?
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
好吧，全文大修也没啥~反正是大修，总不能这样说，醉了~
楼主您好！我也投的这个EA,其中审稿人有一条就是Reviewer #3. : While reading the manuscript, I would like to advise Editor and Authors that there is strong drive among experts in the area to make proper distinction between battery-type and capacitor-type systems.
The manuscript presents the controversial definitions of the terms related to capacitors/supercapacitors.和你的一样，我想问一下这一条您最后是怎么改的！万分感谢
，