当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >投稿一天,给了如下意见,请问大家是什么意思?谢谢

投稿一天,给了如下意见,请问大家是什么意思?谢谢

作者 oneday1991
来源: 小木虫 1300 26 举报帖子
+关注

With regard to the aforementioned manuscript submitted for consideration of publication in the XXX a decision has now been reached.  Specifically, based on my own editorial perusal of the manuscript I do not believe, with all due respect to the work, that the paper in its present form is properly developed to be considered for publication.  This decision is reached in conjunction with the additional objective of safeguarding the conceptual novelty and thematic balance of the research disseminated via the journal.  However, it is felt that a revised manuscript reflecting further conceptual and methodological substantiation could be appropriate for submission to XXX as a new paper.  Nonetheless, exercising this option - not offered to every paper processed for the journal - is entirely your decision. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • oneday1991

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by pengc201 at 2016-01-13 11:05:13
    就是拒稿了啊。然后很客气的让你修改之后再投。但是基本是客套话。
    如果真的是一天就拒了,那说明文章有大问题,编辑直接拒的没找reviewer。
    或者是实验有重大缺陷或者是extremely poorly written.

    意思是我修改后还可以继续投这个期刊是吧

  • lvshidong

    好好修改,可以继续投,如果文章的实质性问题没有通过修改解决的话,还是建议楼主换一个期刊投吧。祝好运 。

  • zonghuan208

    这是拒稿的回复。虽然很客气的让你修改之后再投。但是基本是客套话。应该是文章有大问题,编辑直接拒稿,我也遇到这种情况,只有大修补充内容后改投或再投,

  • oneday1991

    The manuscript in its present form reads like a textbook exercise and not a XXX paper.  The archival contributions of the work need to be clearly spelled out.  In addition, the references listed are from quite a narrow set and this needs to be expanded to put the material in better context of prior work published in the XXX.
    这是具体的意见,各位看具体什么意思,我是不是按照这个修改就可以了

  • nom8393

    这个评语,基本上文章要重写了。小修小改没有意义。

  • oneday1991

    引用回帖:
    5楼: Originally posted by zonghuan208 at 2016-01-13 14:31:51
    这是拒稿的回复。虽然很客气的让你修改之后再投。但是基本是客套话。应该是文章有大问题,编辑直接拒稿,我也遇到这种情况,只有大修补充内容后改投或再投,

    麻烦看一下6楼,是具体的意见

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓