Çë½ÌÕâ¸öËãÊÇ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿
²©Ê¿µÄµÚһƪÎÄÕÂͶµ½ISME J Éó¸å2Ôºó¸ørevision¡£3¸öÉó¸åÈË Á½¸öÆÀ¼Û±È½ÏºÃ »¹ÓиöûÆÀ¼ÛºÃ»µ Ö»ÌáÁ˼¸¸öÎÊÌâ¡£ ±à¼»ØÐÅÈçÏ£¬ÇëÎʸ÷λÕâ¸öËãÊÇminor »¹ÊÇ major revision? лл¸÷λ
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to The ISME Journal. Your manuscript was reviewed by several experts in the field; and we are enclosing the comments they have made. As you can see, the reviewers think that the work is of potential interest; however, significant concerns have also been voiced, which would preclude publication of the paper in its present form.
We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. The manuscript requires a thorough revision and as you can see from the comments that most points raised are straight forward to consider. I would agree with referees #1 and #3 that you need to make the effort to better explain the methods and reasoning behind your experimental/cultivation design and consider related studies. Please also comment on the origin of the strain.
Generally, a revised manuscript should be re-submitted within 1 month. Additional time for revision may be granted to the authors upon request. Please inform the editorial office immediately if you anticipate need for such an extension. ·µ»ØСľ³æ²é¿´¸ü¶à
° a thorough revision¡± ´ÓÕâÀï¿´ÄãÓ¦¸ÃÊÇ´óÐÞ¡£
ÁíÍâISME JÉ϶ÔÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒªÇó¿ÉÒÔ¿´³ö
Manuscripts that are sent for formal review typically go to multiple referees. Based on their advice, the editor decides to:
1¡¢accept the manuscript, with or without minor revision
2¡¢invite the authors to revise the manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached
3¡¢reject the manuscript, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems.
Ã÷ÏԱ༻ظ´ÖÐÌáµ½We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. ËùÒÔ¾ÍÊǶÔÓ¦µÚ¶þÌõ´óÐÞ ¶ø·ÇµÚÒ»ÌõСÐÞ¡£µ«ÊÇ´óÐÞ1¸öÔÂʱ¼äÉÏÓеã¶Ì£¬²»²¹³ä´óʵÑéµÄ»°£¬µ¹Ò²»¹¿ÉÒÔ¡£¼ÓÓÍ£¬×£Äã³É¹¦£¬
´óÐÞ£¬²»¹ý²»¹Ü´óÐÞСÐÞ¶¼ÒªÈÏÕæÐ޸ġ£Ò»°ã¶¼²»»áÓÐÎÊÌâµÄ¡£
´óÐÞÐ޸ĵúã¬Â¼ÓÿÉÄÜÐԺܸߣ»Ð¡ÐÞÐ޸ĵò»µ½Î»£¬Ò²»á±»¾Ü¡£ËùÒԺúÃÐÞ¸ÄÊǸù±¾
°´ÕÕËûµÄÒâ˼Ӧ¸ÃÊÇ´óÐÞ
˵ÉÏÈ¥ÊÇ´óÐÞ£¬µ«Ëã²»ÉÏ´óÐÞ£¬´óÐÞreviseµÄʱ¼ä¶ÎÓ¦¸ÃÊÇ2-3¸öÔ£¬µ«ÊÇÂ¥Ö÷µÄÖ»ÊÇÒ»¸öÔ£¬ÈÏÕæÐÞ¸ÄÏàÐÅÒ»¶¨ÊǺõĽá¹û