| ²é¿´: 1490 | »Ø¸´: 6 | |||
eagles123½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Çë½ÌÕâ¸öËãÊÇ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
²©Ê¿µÄµÚһƪÎÄÕÂͶµ½ISME J Éó¸å2Ôºó¸ørevision¡£3¸öÉó¸åÈË Á½¸öÆÀ¼Û±È½ÏºÃ »¹ÓиöûÆÀ¼ÛºÃ»µ Ö»ÌáÁ˼¸¸öÎÊÌâ¡£ ±à¼»ØÐÅÈçÏ£¬ÇëÎʸ÷λÕâ¸öËãÊÇminor »¹ÊÇ major revision? лл¸÷λ Thank you for submitting your manuscript to The ISME Journal. Your manuscript was reviewed by several experts in the field; and we are enclosing the comments they have made. As you can see, the reviewers think that the work is of potential interest; however, significant concerns have also been voiced, which would preclude publication of the paper in its present form. We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. The manuscript requires a thorough revision and as you can see from the comments that most points raised are straight forward to consider. I would agree with referees #1 and #3 that you need to make the effort to better explain the methods and reasoning behind your experimental/cultivation design and consider related studies. Please also comment on the origin of the strain. Generally, a revised manuscript should be re-submitted within 1 month. Additional time for revision may be granted to the authors upon request. Please inform the editorial office immediately if you anticipate need for such an extension. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
286·ÖÈ˹¤ÖÇÄÜרҵÇëÇóµ÷¼ÁÔ¸Òâ¿ç¿¼£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
279Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ071000£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
279·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
332Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
0856²ÄÁÏר˶353Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏѧѧ˶080502 337Çóµ÷¼Á-Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085601µ÷¼Á 358·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Çë½Ì---- ÂÛÎÄ´óÐÞºó»¹ÓпÉÄܱ»¾ÜÂ𣿣¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
chemical communicationsСÐÞ£¬Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÇë½Ì
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
µ÷²éÒ»ÏÂIEEE TransµÄÂÛÎÄÐ޸ĺ󣨰üÀ¨´óÐÞСÐÞ£©£¬¼¸Ìì½ÓÊܵİ¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
·¸Á˺ܶàµÍ¼¶´íÎ󣬯ÀÉóÒâ¼ûΪ´óÐÞ£¬Çó½Ì·¢±íµÄ¿ÉÄÜÐÔ
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
µÚÒ»´Î×ö¹úÍâÆÚ¿¯Éó¸åÈË£¬ÏëÇë½Ìǰ±²ÃÇ ´óÐÞ Ð¡ÐÞ ÈçºÎ½ç¶¨£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄÐ޸ĵڶþ´ÎÁË£¬Ò²Ã»ÓÐд´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¬¶¼ÊÇrevise£¬µÚ¶þ´ÎÐ޸ͼ°ë¸öÔ»¹Ã»ÏûÏ¢
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ò»ÄêºóÊÕµ½³õÉóÒâ¼ûû±êÃ÷´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
½ô¼±ÇóÖú:Energy srouces Ò»´Î´óÐÞ£¬Ò»´ÎСÐÞºó¾Ü¸å£¬Äܹ»¸øÖ÷±àдÐÅ˵Ã÷Çé¿ö
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
Electrochimica Acta ¶þÉó±à¼µÄ»ØÐÅûÓÐ˵´óÐÞСÐÞ
ÒѾÓÐ40È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û£ºÒ»¸ö´óÐÞ£¬Á½¸öСÐÞ
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
ÎҵĵÚÒ»SCIͶ¸å·µ»ØÒâ¼ûÁË£¬Õâ¸öËã´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿ Physica A
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
PRBÕâÑùµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûËãÊÇ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÕâÊôÓÚ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ37È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´£¬ÎÒÕâÖÖÇé¿öÊôÓÚ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
µÚһƪSCI½ÓÊܵÄÇúÕÛ¹ý³Ì£º2´Î´óÐÞ+1´ÎСÐÞ+4´ÎËÍÉó¡£
ÒѾÓÐ223È˻ظ´
Çë¿´ÏÂÕâ¸öÊÇ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
СÐÞ»òÕß´óÐÞÒ»°ã¶à¾Ã¸øÏûÏ¢£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ChemComm´ÓСÐÞ±ä³É´óÐÞ£±¯°§°¢£¬Í´Ðİ¢£¬°Ù¸Ð½»¼¯
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÕâÊôÓÚ´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕ¸øÐ޸ģ¬Óöµ½µãÎÊÌ⣬²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ð£¬Ïò°æÉϵÄÐֵܽãÃÃÇë½Ì£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
СÐÞ±ä´óÐÞ£¬´ó¿ÞÒ»³¡£¡¸ÃÔõô°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ82È˻ظ´
°ïÎÒ¿´¿´°¡:±à¼ÊÇÒª´óÐÞ»¹ÊÇСÐÞ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
´óÐÞÖ®ºóµÄСÐÞ£¬Ôõô°ìÄØ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åMSE-CÇë½Ì¸÷λ³æÓÑ£¬Ð¡ÐÞ»¹»á·µ»Ø¸øÉó¸åÈËÂð
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
kydarling
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 32068.6
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 946
- ÔÚÏß: 199.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 442320
- ×¢²á: 2007-10-27
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³Î¢ÉúÎïѧ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
eagles123: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-03-11 13:41:01
laozuzunzhe: ½ð±Ò+3, good! 2013-03-11 14:21:33
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
eagles123: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-03-11 13:41:01
laozuzunzhe: ½ð±Ò+3, good! 2013-03-11 14:21:33
|
¡° a thorough revision¡± ´ÓÕâÀï¿´ÄãÓ¦¸ÃÊÇ´óÐÞ¡£ ÁíÍâISME JÉ϶ÔÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒªÇó¿ÉÒÔ¿´³ö Manuscripts that are sent for formal review typically go to multiple referees. Based on their advice, the editor decides to: 1¡¢accept the manuscript, with or without minor revision 2¡¢invite the authors to revise the manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached 3¡¢reject the manuscript, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems. Ã÷ÏԱ༻ظ´ÖÐÌáµ½We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. ËùÒÔ¾ÍÊǶÔÓ¦µÚ¶þÌõ´óÐÞ ¶ø·ÇµÚÒ»ÌõСÐÞ¡£µ«ÊÇ´óÐÞ1¸öÔÂʱ¼äÉÏÓеã¶Ì£¬²»²¹³ä´óʵÑéµÄ»°£¬µ¹Ò²»¹¿ÉÒÔ¡£¼ÓÓÍ£¬×£Äã³É¹¦£¡ |

2Â¥2013-03-11 00:28:01
aardwolf1986
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3294.4
- É¢½ð: 424
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 455
- ÔÚÏß: 108.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 943926
- ×¢²á: 2010-01-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
3Â¥2013-03-11 03:10:34
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
4Â¥2013-03-11 08:15:08
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
5Â¥2013-03-11 08:33:33
zhoupeng87
°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
- Ó¦Öú: 6148 (¸±½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 8.516
- ½ð±Ò: 47410.3
- É¢½ð: 58001
- ºì»¨: 566
- ɳ·¢: 2391
- Ìû×Ó: 64964
- ÔÚÏß: 9636.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 962700
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú²ÄÁÏ»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: ¾«Ï¸»¯¹¤
6Â¥2013-03-11 13:46:18
7Â¥2014-08-18 11:38:51













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥