应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 生物医药区 » 微生物 » 综合其他 » 请教这个算是大修还是小修？
21/1返回列表
查看: 1411  |  回复: 6
查看全部回帖@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

eagles123

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 请教这个算是大修还是小修？已有1人参与

博士的第一篇文章投到ISME J 审稿2月后给revision。3个审稿人 两个评价比较好 还有个没评价好坏 只提了几个问题。  编辑回信如下，请问各位这个算是minor 还是 major revision?  谢谢各位


Thank you for submitting your manuscript to The ISME Journal. Your manuscript was reviewed by several experts in the field; and we are enclosing the comments they have made. As you can see, the reviewers think that the work is of potential interest; however, significant concerns have also been voiced, which would preclude publication of the paper in its present form.

We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. The manuscript requires a thorough revision and as you can see from the comments that most points raised are straight forward to consider. I would agree with referees #1 and #3 that you need to make the effort to better explain the methods and reasoning behind your experimental/cultivation design and consider related studies. Please also comment on the origin of the strain.
Generally, a revised manuscript should be re-submitted within 1 month. Additional time for revision may be granted to the authors upon request. Please inform the editorial office immediately if you anticipate need for such an extension.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2013-03-10 10:10:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aardwolf1986

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
大修，不过不管大修小修都要认真修改。一般都不会有问题的。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2013-03-11 03:10:34
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 eagles123 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭