24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1887  |  回复: 6

eagles123

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 请教这个算是大修还是小修? 已有1人参与

博士的第一篇文章投到ISME J 审稿2月后给revision。3个审稿人 两个评价比较好 还有个没评价好坏 只提了几个问题。  编辑回信如下,请问各位这个算是minor 还是 major revision?  谢谢各位


Thank you for submitting your manuscript to The ISME Journal. Your manuscript was reviewed by several experts in the field; and we are enclosing the comments they have made. As you can see, the reviewers think that the work is of potential interest; however, significant concerns have also been voiced, which would preclude publication of the paper in its present form.

We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. The manuscript requires a thorough revision and as you can see from the comments that most points raised are straight forward to consider. I would agree with referees #1 and #3 that you need to make the effort to better explain the methods and reasoning behind your experimental/cultivation design and consider related studies. Please also comment on the origin of the strain.
Generally, a revised manuscript should be re-submitted within 1 month. Additional time for revision may be granted to the authors upon request. Please inform the editorial office immediately if you anticipate need for such an extension.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kydarling

铜虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
eagles123: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2013-03-11 13:41:01
laozuzunzhe: 金币+3, good! 2013-03-11 14:21:33
“ a thorough revision” 从这里看你应该是大修。

另外ISME J上对审稿人的要求可以看出
Manuscripts that are sent for formal review typically go to multiple referees. Based on their advice, the editor decides to:
1、accept the manuscript, with or without minor revision
2、invite the authors to revise the manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached
3、reject the manuscript, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems.

明显编辑回复中提到We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors.  所以就是对应第二条大修 而非第一条小修。但是大修1个月时间上有点短,不补充大实验的话,倒也还可以。加油,祝你成功!
环境微生物学
2楼2013-03-11 00:28:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aardwolf1986

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
大修,不过不管大修小修都要认真修改。一般都不会有问题的。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2013-03-11 03:10:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mokey11

禁虫 (小有名气)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖内容被屏蔽

4楼2013-03-11 08:15:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
eagles123: 金币+3, 有帮助 2013-03-11 13:41:19
大修修改得好,录用可能性很高;小修修改得不到位,也会被拒。所以好好修改是根本
5楼2013-03-11 08:33:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhoupeng87

版主 (文学泰斗)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
按照他的意思应该是大修
6楼2013-03-11 13:46:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjy_2013

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

说上去是大修,但算不上大修,大修revise的时间段应该是2-3个月,但是楼主的只是一个月,认真修改相信一定是好的结果
7楼2014-08-18 11:38:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 eagles123 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 11/550 2026-09-02 14:15 by simwe390
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
信息提示
请填处理意见