24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1409  |  回复: 6
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

eagles123

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 请教这个算是大修还是小修?已有1人参与

博士的第一篇文章投到ISME J 审稿2月后给revision。3个审稿人 两个评价比较好 还有个没评价好坏 只提了几个问题。  编辑回信如下,请问各位这个算是minor 还是 major revision?  谢谢各位


Thank you for submitting your manuscript to The ISME Journal. Your manuscript was reviewed by several experts in the field; and we are enclosing the comments they have made. As you can see, the reviewers think that the work is of potential interest; however, significant concerns have also been voiced, which would preclude publication of the paper in its present form.

We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. The manuscript requires a thorough revision and as you can see from the comments that most points raised are straight forward to consider. I would agree with referees #1 and #3 that you need to make the effort to better explain the methods and reasoning behind your experimental/cultivation design and consider related studies. Please also comment on the origin of the strain.
Generally, a revised manuscript should be re-submitted within 1 month. Additional time for revision may be granted to the authors upon request. Please inform the editorial office immediately if you anticipate need for such an extension.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mokey11

禁虫 (小有名气)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖内容被屏蔽

4楼2013-03-11 08:15:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答

kydarling

铜虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
eagles123: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2013-03-11 13:41:01
laozuzunzhe: 金币+3, good! 2013-03-11 14:21:33
“ a thorough revision” 从这里看你应该是大修。

另外ISME J上对审稿人的要求可以看出
Manuscripts that are sent for formal review typically go to multiple referees. Based on their advice, the editor decides to:
1、accept the manuscript, with or without minor revision
2、invite the authors to revise the manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached
3、reject the manuscript, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems.

明显编辑回复中提到We are willing to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors.  所以就是对应第二条大修 而非第一条小修。但是大修1个月时间上有点短,不补充大实验的话,倒也还可以。加油,祝你成功!
环境微生物学
2楼2013-03-11 00:28:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aardwolf1986

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
大修,不过不管大修小修都要认真修改。一般都不会有问题的。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2013-03-11 03:10:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
eagles123: 金币+3, 有帮助 2013-03-11 13:41:19
大修修改得好,录用可能性很高;小修修改得不到位,也会被拒。所以好好修改是根本
5楼2013-03-11 08:33:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见