收到SCI的审稿意见,但是真的不知道该怎么修改啊
1-The objective, methodology, and results should be better described, discussed and justified.
2- The current literature review is not sufficient and research gap is not clear.
3- The results should be expanded significantly and quantitatively.
4- I strongly suggest that authors shall carry out more studies to compare the results from this paper to that from other similar studies.
5- Add numerical results in the abstract.
6-Moreover, try to enhance the explanation of the paper equation by the physical point of view (not only the symbols and the units). Furthermore, provide references for the selected equations where it is possible.
收到SCI的审稿意见,但是真的不知道该怎么修改啊,特别是第一条,太泛了吧,感觉是不是想要拒
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
确实,难度不小
。
。
都是相对比较具体的意见,修改回复无太大难度,
。
加油!祝福!
。