°ïæ¿´¿´Éó¸åÒâ¼û~figuresÓëgraphicsµÄÇø±ð
1.2ͶµÄij3Çøsci,3.15 current status±äΪresive,view decisionΪresive,ÊÕµ½µÄÓʼþÈçÏ£º
dear xx,
thank you for submitting your paper to xxxx. the article has been revised by an external reviewer and the editors. as you will see, they have found it of potential interest, but raised important criticisms which the editors share. therefore, we will consider a resubmission of your paper if you are interested in modifying its contents taking into account the suggestions of the referees, which you will find appended below.
if you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes (or a rebuttal against each point raised) along with the revised manuscript. changes made in response to reviewer comments should be highlighted in the text of the manuscript.
...
...
...
please understand that we cannot assure publication of a revised paper, since the final editorial decision will be made after reevaluation by the referees. the new version should be sent to the editorial office by jun 13, 2021, otherwise it will be considered as a new submission.
reviewer #1:
..........¹ØÓÚÑо¿ÄÚÈݵÄÃèÊö......
this results might be interesting and worthwhile for publication and coherent with the aims of the journal .
nevertheless the discussion is redundant and should be more fluent.
figures should be less crowed and, maybe, graphics might be useful
Çë¸÷λ³æÓѰïæ¿´¿´Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÊÇÒªÔÙ¾«¼òÌÖÂÛÄÚÈݵÄÒâ˼Âð£¿×îºóÒ»¾ä²»ÊǺܶ®£¬figuresÓëgraphicsµÄÇø±ðÊÇʲô£¿ÕâÀïfiguresÊÇָʲô£¿Ð»Ð»£¡
·µ»ØÐ¡Ä¾³æ²é¿´¸ü¶à
¾©¹«Íø°²±¸ 11010802022153ºÅ
ÎÒÀí½âµÄÊÇfigÊÇ˵ʲôÖùÐÎͼɢµãͼ֮ÀàµÄ£¬graÊÇָʵÑé¹ý³ÌÖÐÅÄÕÕµÄͼƬ£¬±ÈÈçÄÃÄãµÄÑùÆ·ÅÄÕÕÖ®ÀàµÄ£¬ÎҲµÄ
лл»Ø¸´£¬µ«×öµÄÄÚÈÝÊÇÁ÷Ðв¡Ñ§·½ÃæµÄ£¬Ã»ÓÐÉæ¼°ÊµÑéµÄ¸÷ÖÖͼÆ
£¬
graphicsÊÇÄã×Ô¼º×ܽáÊý¾Ý»³öÀ´µÄͼ£¬ figureÊÇÂÛÎÄÀïÿÕÅͼµÄ×ܳƿÉÒÔÊÇÒ»¸öºÏ¼¯¡£¿ÉÄÜÒâ˼ÄãÕÕÆ¬Ì«¶à£¬ÓÐÊý¾Ý×ܽáµÄͼ±íÌ«ÉÙÁË
Äã
Õâ²»ÊÇÖ±½Ó¾Ü¸å£¬¶øÊÇÒªÇó´óÐÞºóÖØÍ¶¡£
´óÖµÄÒâ˼ÊÇÕâÑùµÄ£º
Õâ¸ö½á¹ûÏ൱ÓÐȤ£¬ÖµµÃ·¢±í£¬Ò²Óë¸ÃÆÚ¿¯µÄÄ¿±êÒ»Ö¡£
È»¶ø£¬ÌÖÂÛÓеãÈß׸£¬ÊÔ×ÅʹÆä¸ü¼ÓÁ÷³©¡£
²»ÒªÓÃÒ»¶ÑÊý×Ö£¬¿ÉÒÔ¿¼ÂÇÓÃͼ±í³ÊÏÖ¡£
FigureÔÚÕâÀï±íʾÊý×Ö£¬Éó¸åÈ˽¨×hÄãÓÃͼ±íÈ¡´ú¡£