| 查看: 2320 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
帮忙看看审稿意见~figures与graphics的区别 已有2人参与
|
|
1.2投的某3区sci,3.15 current status变为resive,view decision为resive,收到的邮件如下： dear xx, thank you for submitting your paper to xxxx. the article has been revised by an external reviewer and the editors. as you will see, they have found it of potential interest, but raised important criticisms which the editors share. therefore, we will consider a resubmission of your paper if you are interested in modifying its contents taking into account the suggestions of the referees, which you will find appended below. if you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes (or a rebuttal against each point raised) along with the revised manuscript. changes made in response to reviewer comments should be highlighted in the text of the manuscript. ... ... ... please understand that we cannot assure publication of a revised paper, since the final editorial decision will be made after reevaluation by the referees. the new version should be sent to the editorial office by jun 13, 2021, otherwise it will be considered as a new submission. reviewer #1: ..........关于研究内容的描述...... this results might be interesting and worthwhile for publication and coherent with the aims of the journal . nevertheless the discussion is redundant and should be more fluent. figures should be less crowed and, maybe, graphics might be useful 请各位虫友帮忙看看审稿意见，是要再精简讨论内容的意思吗？最后一句不是很懂，figures与graphics的区别是什么？这里figures是指什么？谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
【长期招聘】复旦大学 AI 制药实验室 博士后招聘
已经有11人回复
-
2027博士申请-临床检验诊断学、病原生物学、微生物方向
已经有5人回复
-
各位基础老师们，看完中央《从严治党》的决定后，对学术界更加有信心了吧
已经有4人回复
luokereng
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10274.2
- 散金: 12112
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 4805
- 在线: 780.2小时
- 虫号: 2218058
- 注册: 2013-01-02
- 专业: 食品科学
2楼2021-03-16 18:25:21
3楼2021-03-17 11:01:49
4楼2021-03-23 19:34:51
5楼2021-03-23 20:44:22
6楼2021-03-25 18:38:07