24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

cjf-88

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 339.3
帖子: 34
在线: 25.7小时
虫号: 1718887
注册: 2012-03-26
专业: 流行病学方法与卫生统计

[求助] 帮忙看看审稿意见~figures与graphics的区别已有2人参与

1.2投的某3区sci,3.15 current status变为resive,view decision为resive,收到的邮件如下：

dear xx,

thank you for submitting your paper to xxxx. the article has been revised by an external reviewer and the editors. as you will see, they have found it of potential interest, but raised important criticisms which the editors share. therefore, we will consider a resubmission of your paper if you are interested in modifying its contents taking into account the suggestions of the referees, which you will find appended below.

if you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes (or a rebuttal against each point raised) along with the revised manuscript. changes made in response to reviewer comments should be highlighted in the text of the manuscript.
...
...
...
please understand that we cannot assure publication of a revised paper, since the final editorial decision will be made after reevaluation by the referees. the new version should be sent to the editorial office by jun 13, 2021, otherwise it will be considered as a new submission.

reviewer #1:
..........关于研究内容的描述......
this results might be interesting and worthwhile for publication and coherent with the aims of the journal .
nevertheless the discussion is redundant and should be more fluent.
figures should be less crowed and, maybe, graphics might be useful
请各位虫友帮忙看看审稿意见，是要再精简讨论内容的意思吗？最后一句不是很懂，figures与graphics的区别是什么？这里figures是指什么？谢谢！

回复此楼