刚开始给我的小修意见很好：“The referee(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the referee(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.”

但是小修后感觉重新外审换了一个审稿人：
“Unfortunately there are already numerous studies that use robotic equipment; mostly a robotic arm; to facilitate the use of the study of technology in educational and academic environments. A quick search of the IEEE database will give you a large number of references in this regard.
From a novelty point of view, your study does nothing more than insist on it, but it does not contribute anything new that modifies or improves what already exists.
In recent years, the use of IoT technology has been linked to these experiences, with which your paper does not contribute anything new in that sense either.
For this reason I must advise to reject your paper.”
我觉得我搞了半年时间，而且已经小修了，怎么会出现完全不同的审稿意见，想问下这种情况可以找编辑申诉吗？ 返回小木虫查看更多