投了SCI小修后被拒，想问下可以不可以发邮件给编辑申诉
刚开始给我的小修意见很好：“The referee(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the referee(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.”
但是小修后感觉重新外审换了一个审稿人：
“Unfortunately there are already numerous studies that use robotic equipment; mostly a robotic arm; to facilitate the use of the study of technology in educational and academic environments. A quick search of the IEEE database will give you a large number of references in this regard.
From a novelty point of view, your study does nothing more than insist on it, but it does not contribute anything new that modifies or improves what already exists.
In recent years, the use of IoT technology has been linked to these experiences, with which your paper does not contribute anything new in that sense either.
For this reason I must advise to reject your paper.”
我觉得我搞了半年时间，而且已经小修了，怎么会出现完全不同的审稿意见，想问下这种情况可以找编辑申诉吗？
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
我也有碰到这种情况，可以找主编argue，但是到底能不能接受就看主编啦
潞脙脽脮脨禄脨禄禄脴赂麓拢卢脧毛脦脢脛煤脧脗拢卢脮芒赂枚脡锚脣脽脨猫脪陋赂酶脰梅卤脿路垄脫脢录镁脗冒拢卢脫茂脝酶脫娄赂脙脭玫脙麓脣碌拢卢脦脪脨麓脕脣赂枚脫脢录镁赂脨戮玫脩炉脦脢脦陋脢虏脙麓脟掳潞贸脡贸赂氓脪芒录没虏禄脪禄脩霉脢脟虏禄脢脟虏禄脌帽脙虏拢卢禄貌脮脽脫茂脝酶脤芦脰脴拢�
，
祝福
“From a novelty point of view, your study does nothing more than insist on it, but it does not contribute anything new that modifies or improves what already exists.”可以 Argue， 但你得找出强有力的证据反驳该审稿意见，否则就只能改投它刊
IEEE数据库 记载太多相关 这个是硬伤
可以argue，但是似乎成功率不高，我身边的几个人argue，最后都不怎么搭理的，最好同时找好的可以转投的期刊
可能性不大。审稿意见说你的文章没有创新性，对比之前的研究没有任何的改进，此种情况可以直接拒稿。