我引用的参考文献的陈述,审稿人不认同这篇文献的观点,我该怎么回答审稿人的意见?
审稿人意见:"Chen et al. investigated the performances of thermal-concentrated solar thermoelectric generators, and it was found that under the situation of forced convection, water cooling was better than air cooling for the net output power of the TEG due to its increased specific heat [1]. " This statement is misleading Ref[1] did say that but it has nothing to do with the performance of the TEG, because it does NOT depend on the specific heat of the coolant. What Ref. 1 meant to say is the TEG performance itself does not change with the types of coolant, but the pumping power to flow the coolant does depend on the coolant properties (water vs air), so the net power (TEG output power minus the pumping power) also depends on the coolant types. In fact, I am not sure if specific heat is the dominant factor for the pumping power. I would guess it is the density. Also, it is very difficult to get the HTC of 1000 W/m2/K for forced convection with air (that is why an excessive pumping power is needed). In any case, I would urge the authors to carefully and critically review the papers they cited, to make sure they don't just blindly follow the conclusions of these paper or otherwise misinterpret their results.
大致意思是:我引用的这篇文献的观点,审稿人不认同,所以他觉得我在引入这篇文献时在盲从,请问审稿人的这种问题该怎么回答?我直接把这篇文献删掉?好像也不合适啊。
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
按理剧争方为上上策
貌似审稿人说你片面理解了引用文献中内容的意思
回答引用不太合适,已经换成另外一篇文献?
祝福
审稿人认为你没有读懂参考文献,错误理解了参考文献作者的意思。
,
估计是citation用可以不合适,换一篇文献或者重新表述文字