| 查看: 1572 | 回复: 6 | |||
仙女_1新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
我引用的参考文献的陈述，审稿人不认同这篇文献的观点，我该怎么回答审稿人的意见？ 已有1人参与
|
|
审稿人意见："Chen et al. investigated the performances of thermal-concentrated solar thermoelectric generators, and it was found that under the situation of forced convection, water cooling was better than air cooling for the net output power of the TEG due to its increased specific heat [1]. " This statement is misleading Ref[1] did say that but it has nothing to do with the performance of the TEG, because it does NOT depend on the specific heat of the coolant. What Ref. 1 meant to say is the TEG performance itself does not change with the types of coolant, but the pumping power to flow the coolant does depend on the coolant properties (water vs air), so the net power (TEG output power minus the pumping power) also depends on the coolant types. In fact, I am not sure if specific heat is the dominant factor for the pumping power. I would guess it is the density. Also, it is very difficult to get the HTC of 1000 W/m2/K for forced convection with air (that is why an excessive pumping power is needed). In any case, I would urge the authors to carefully and critically review the papers they cited, to make sure they don't just blindly follow the conclusions of these paper or otherwise misinterpret their results. 大致意思是：我引用的这篇文献的观点，审稿人不认同，所以他觉得我在引入这篇文献时在盲从，请问审稿人的这种问题该怎么回答？我直接把这篇文献删掉？好像也不合适啊。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 英文论文投稿 |
» 猜你喜欢
26调剂 086003
已经有3人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有20人回复
-
271分求调剂学校
已经有11人回复
-
320分人工智能调剂
已经有6人回复
-
求调剂，一志愿南京航空航天大学 ，080500材料科学与工程学硕
已经有8人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
求材料调剂，一志愿郑州大学289分
已经有15人回复
-
26考研调剂0710 0860
已经有6人回复
-
282求调剂
已经有22人回复
-
283求调剂
已经有5人回复
bjvtwdov
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 186.9
- 散金: 400
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 1156
- 在线: 52.8小时
- 虫号: 18682475
- 注册: 2019-10-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化工冶金
2楼2020-09-29 20:39:53
3楼2020-09-29 20:42:27
哈娜酱
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1876.4
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 845
- 在线: 101.7小时
- 虫号: 5598855
- 注册: 2017-02-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 中药药效物质
4楼2020-09-29 20:42:55
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
5楼2020-09-29 22:10:56
qujia001
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6169.1
- 散金: 86
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 904
- 在线: 298.6小时
- 虫号: 1704789
- 注册: 2012-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
6楼2020-09-30 05:12:10
国际科学编辑 
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1532 (讲师)
- 金币: 3627.6
- 散金: 615
- 红花: 275
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7972
- 在线: 146.9小时
- 虫号: 4407167
- 注册: 2016-02-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 病原微生物变异与耐药
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
仙女_1: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案 2020-10-03 12:24:04
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
仙女_1: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案 2020-10-03 12:24:04
|
估计是citation用可以不合适，换一篇文献或者重新表述文字 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
7楼2020-09-30 07:42:02
