24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4756)
>文献求助 (348)
>论文投稿 (299)
>导师招生 (292)
>博后之家 (253)
>虫友互识 (182)
>硕博家园 (100)
>考博 (93)
>有机交流 (81)
>招聘信息布告栏 (73)
>学术会议 (57)
>休闲灌水 (38)
>基金申请 (31)
>教师之家 (26)
>找工作 (25)
>考研 (25)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

仙女_1

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 36.5
散金: 5
帖子: 49
在线: 22.4小时
虫号: 3374698
注册: 2014-08-20
性别: MM
专业: 污染控制化学

[求助] 我引用的参考文献的陈述，审稿人不认同这篇文献的观点，我该怎么回答审稿人的意见？已有1人参与

审稿人意见："Chen et al. investigated the performances of thermal-concentrated solar thermoelectric generators, and it was found that under the situation of forced convection, water cooling was better than air cooling for the net output power of the TEG due to its increased specific heat [1]. " This statement is misleading Ref[1] did say that but it has nothing to do with the performance of the TEG, because it does NOT depend on the specific heat of the coolant. What Ref. 1 meant to say is the TEG performance itself does not change with the types of coolant, but the pumping power to flow the coolant does depend on the coolant properties (water vs air), so the net power (TEG output power minus the pumping power) also depends on the coolant types. In fact, I am not sure if specific heat is the dominant factor for the pumping power. I would guess it is the density. Also, it is very difficult to get the HTC of 1000 W/m2/K for forced convection with air (that is why an excessive pumping power is needed). In any case, I would urge the authors to carefully and critically review the papers they cited, to make sure they don't just blindly follow the conclusions of these paper or otherwise misinterpret their results.
大致意思是：我引用的这篇文献的观点，审稿人不认同，所以他觉得我在引入这篇文献时在盲从，请问审稿人的这种问题该怎么回答？我直接把这篇文献删掉？好像也不合适啊。

回复此楼