| 查看: 1517 | 回复: 6 | |||
仙女_1新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
我引用的参考文献的陈述，审稿人不认同这篇文献的观点，我该怎么回答审稿人的意见？ 已有1人参与
|
|
审稿人意见："Chen et al. investigated the performances of thermal-concentrated solar thermoelectric generators, and it was found that under the situation of forced convection, water cooling was better than air cooling for the net output power of the TEG due to its increased specific heat [1]. " This statement is misleading Ref[1] did say that but it has nothing to do with the performance of the TEG, because it does NOT depend on the specific heat of the coolant. What Ref. 1 meant to say is the TEG performance itself does not change with the types of coolant, but the pumping power to flow the coolant does depend on the coolant properties (water vs air), so the net power (TEG output power minus the pumping power) also depends on the coolant types. In fact, I am not sure if specific heat is the dominant factor for the pumping power. I would guess it is the density. Also, it is very difficult to get the HTC of 1000 W/m2/K for forced convection with air (that is why an excessive pumping power is needed). In any case, I would urge the authors to carefully and critically review the papers they cited, to make sure they don't just blindly follow the conclusions of these paper or otherwise misinterpret their results. 大致意思是：我引用的这篇文献的观点，审稿人不认同，所以他觉得我在引入这篇文献时在盲从，请问审稿人的这种问题该怎么回答？我直接把这篇文献删掉？好像也不合适啊。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 英文论文投稿 |
» 猜你喜欢
欢迎211本科同学，过A区国家线，A区非偏远一本，交叉学科课题组
已经有12人回复
-
成果系统访问量大，请15分钟后再尝试。由此给您造成的不便，敬请谅解。
已经有14人回复
-
281电子信息求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
材料277分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
求调剂院校
已经有12人回复
-
293求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
化学 0703求调剂 总分293 一志愿211
已经有10人回复
-
320材料一志愿西工大专硕英二数二 有两年光伏工作经验
已经有7人回复
-
材料328求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
304分材料专硕求调剂
已经有12人回复
bjvtwdov
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 186.9
- 散金: 400
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 1156
- 在线: 52.8小时
- 虫号: 18682475
- 注册: 2019-10-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化工冶金
2楼2020-09-29 20:39:53
3楼2020-09-29 20:42:27
哈娜酱
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1876.4
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 845
- 在线: 101.7小时
- 虫号: 5598855
- 注册: 2017-02-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 中药药效物质
4楼2020-09-29 20:42:55
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
5楼2020-09-29 22:10:56
qujia001
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6169.1
- 散金: 86
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 904
- 在线: 298.6小时
- 虫号: 1704789
- 注册: 2012-03-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
6楼2020-09-30 05:12:10
国际科学编辑 
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1532 (讲师)
- 金币: 3627.6
- 散金: 615
- 红花: 275
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7972
- 在线: 146.9小时
- 虫号: 4407167
- 注册: 2016-02-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 病原微生物变异与耐药
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
仙女_1: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案 2020-10-03 12:24:04
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
仙女_1: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案 2020-10-03 12:24:04
|
估计是citation用可以不合适，换一篇文献或者重新表述文字 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
7楼2020-09-30 07:42:02
