重复率过高被拒,修改后还有必要再投此期刊吗
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Food Hydrocolloids. Unfortunately, after reviewing your paper I discovered that your submission shows Similarity scores of 28%. In this case, the overlap goes beyond the normal occurrence of standard phrases in your field. There are many sections which seem to be unoriginal, having appeared mostly in the following previously published work:
Food Packaging and Shelf Life.Volume 22, December 2019, 100413
Food Hydrocolloids.Volume 75, February 2018, Pages 13-21
Your paper contains a significant amount of textual and findings overlap with the mentioned previously published works. Moreover, this prior work has not been cited in your submission. For this reason your paper cannot be considered for publication.
It is the policy of Food Hydrocolloids to publish new and original work. Text copied from copyrighted works from third parties, even in an introduction, should never be used without clearly identifying the other source (either by quotations or indentations). Every paper should present some novelty and new results in the form of a unique paper written in an author's own words.
求大佬们帮我分析一下编辑的回复,我还有必要修改降重后,再投此期刊吗?感觉编辑的回复不是很友好,开始没注意重复率这个问题
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
重复率这个问题现在越来越严格了,他提到的这两篇你重复了不少,怎么会没引用呢,如果这个期刊还可以的话,你按照意见好好修改一下,自己先查一下重,可以继续投
“感觉编辑的回复不是很友好”但我没有这种感觉,编辑只是实事求是而已。我和一位虫友合作写的综述,查重没过关,被拒。我们降重后,大修,前不久已经接收。
我感觉主编只是陈述了事实,而且给你指出具体的文章,可以大修,尽量不要和这两篇文章过多重复,没有说拒绝重投,如果修改好了,个人感觉可以继续投稿的
降低重复率,再投没问题的。
按照审稿意见好好改妥后可以继续投的。需要注意的是一要降低重复率,二要有创新性亮点。祝顺利
请教一般重复率要多少才算合理呢,很多专业名词有时候实在没法改,尤其是跟自己的文章特别容易重复,因为自己写的时候遣词造句跟以前发表的论文雷同了都不知道
,
请教一下后面重复率降到多少呢