Optics Express投稿求助
投Optics Express，两个审稿人，意见如下：
Reviewer1: Overall a good paper that's unfortunately not giving any experimental results, but I still recommend publishing it as steeping stone for some cool applications perhaps. The writing quality can be improved by following some revision suggestions listed above. I recommend publishing it after revisions.
Reviewer2:Although this work presents technically sound results, the Authors should explicitly discuss what the practical applications of this theoretical study are and they should stress the advancements of their work concerning what is already present in literature.
编辑：We regret to advise you that your manuscript has not been accepted for publication in Optics Express. The reviewer comments are included below. The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one.
请问这种修改后重投还有希望吗？谢谢！
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
按要求认真修改后，如果送审，机会比较大
茨愕穆畚暮貌缓酶牧耍酶目梢猿⑹韵滦薷脑偻叮绻缓酶模ㄒ橹苯友∫桓銎渌钠诳�