Optics Express投稿求助
投Optics Express，两个审稿人，意见如下：
Reviewer1: Overall a good paper that's unfortunately not giving any experimental results, but I still recommend publishing it as steeping stone for some cool applications perhaps. The writing quality can be improved by following some revision suggestions listed above. I recommend publishing it after revisions.
Reviewer2:Although this work presents technically sound results, the Authors should explicitly discuss what the practical applications of this theoretical study are and they should stress the advancements of their work concerning what is already present in literature.
编辑：We regret to advise you that your manuscript has not been accepted for publication in Optics Express. The reviewer comments are included below. The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one.
请问这种修改后重投还有希望吗？谢谢！
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这要看你怎么改了，请注意编辑的回复，应该已经说的很明了。
1.引言部分可能没有较为全面的介绍与该研究相关的进展，所以不能凸显该文章对推动这一相关领域研究的意义，即该文章的特色或新颖性到底是什么。
2.与1比较相似，主要还是该文章的价值定位，所谓的修改 再修改也不会突破它既有的局限性，编辑的意思涉及到你研究的局限性，这是无法通过言语的技巧去回避的，最多只能是以后工作的内容。
没用，大概率让你发那个新的水刊
祝福
“The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one.”
看了能否改的很彻底了
OSA Continuum嘛，哈哈~
，
下一个