当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >登录投稿系统,发现Accept,非常高兴,但是看到发给邮件的意见,我又沉默了

登录投稿系统,发现Accept,非常高兴,但是看到发给邮件的意见,我又沉默了

作者 xiaochoujiao
来源: 小木虫 550 11 举报帖子
+关注

尊敬的各位大咖,小弟投递一篇文章(关于鲸鱼算法优化的),系统显示的是Accept,Accept for final submission,非常高兴,但是随后查看邮箱,
Your manuscript entitled "*********** Whale Algorithm" has been accepted for publication in XXXXX. The comments of the reviewers who reviewed your manuscript are included at the foot of this letter. We ask that you make changes to your manuscript based on those comments, before uploading final files.
但是后面,发现了审稿人1写如下这段话:
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)
Comments:
Actually, the paper has been significantly improved as some of my recommendations have been taken into considerations. However, the author ignore the most important comment. Thus, I will mention it again and he must consider it seriously.
1) Regarding the selected benchmark problems F1-18 , the author must evaluate the proposed algorithm (IWOA) on all CEC2017 benchmark problems on D=10,30,50 and 100. The number of runs is 51 for each problem in each dimension, the total function evaluations are 100000,300000,500000 and 1000000 for D=10,30,50,100.
Besides, he must compare the proposed algorithm against top-tier algorithms not basic algorithms i.e. AGDE, EAGDE, EFADE,EBLSHADE,JSO algorithms.
Please refer to the technical report
[1]N.H. Awad, M.Z. Ali, J.J. Liang, B.Y. Qu, P. N. Suganthan, “Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2017 Special Session and Competition on Single Objective Real-Parameter Numerical Optimization,” Nanyang Technological University, Jordan University of Science and Technology and Zhengzhou University, Tech. Rep., 2016.
Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: YES
Is the paper technically sound?: YES
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: partially
Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: yes

注意:其中说的AGDE, EAGDE是该审稿人在上一期审稿中提出的问题;
In the experimental section, the comparison part seems to be very limited. The authors have used only few algorithms for comparison. Two to three more recent versions of DE should be added for comparison.


小弟我实在经验不足,困惑了:
(1)文章还需要按照审稿专家1的意见修改吗?编辑不都已经给了录用了吗?
(2)如果修改,我真不知道top-tier algorithm是指哪些算法?有谁知道吗?
还请各位过来人给个指导意见 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • yangzaoli

    哪个期刊?你的proposed method 是聚合算子吗?

  • Messinan

    等待大佬解答

  • 懵德尔

    帮顶  内容看不懂 但是没遇到这种已经通知接收还要修改的情况

  • xiaochoujiao

    引用回帖:
    4楼: Originally posted by 懵德尔 at 2020-05-01 14:51:30
    帮顶  内容看不懂 但是没遇到这种已经通知接收还要修改的情况

    我后来看了论坛里一些相似的情况(都是说听编辑的,审稿人意见不用考虑),我直接提交终稿了,因为无法修改,编辑邮箱里有一句话:However, NO CHANGES to the author list or the references will be permitted

  • xiaochoujiao

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by Messinan at 2020-05-01 14:28:25
    等待大佬解答

    我后来看了论坛里一些相似的情况(都是说听编辑的,审稿人的意见不用考虑),我直接提交终稿了,因为无法修改,编辑邮箱里有一句话:However, NO CHANGES to the author list or the references will be permitted.

  • xiaochoujiao

    引用回帖:
    4楼: Originally posted by 懵德尔 at 2020-05-01 14:51:30
    帮顶  内容看不懂 但是没遇到这种已经通知接收还要修改的情况

    我已经添加了审稿人1提供的几篇文献作为本文的参考文献了。唉

  • 阿塔萨达

    看这问题风格非常像IEEE Access的,接收之后其实不用再理会审稿人了,他就是想让你引他论文,但接收之后不能再改引用了,也不会再返回审稿人手里了,直接提交了都行

猜你喜欢