24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3352  |  回复: 11
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者xiaochoujiao将赠送您 10 个金币

xiaochoujiao

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 登录投稿系统,发现Accept,非常高兴,但是看到发给邮件的意见,我又沉默了 已有2人参与

尊敬的各位大咖,小弟投递一篇文章(关于鲸鱼算法优化的),系统显示的是Accept,Accept for final submission,非常高兴,但是随后查看邮箱,
Your manuscript entitled "*********** Whale Algorithm" has been accepted for publication in XXXXX. The comments of the reviewers who reviewed your manuscript are included at the foot of this letter. We ask that you make changes to your manuscript based on those comments, before uploading final files.
但是后面,发现了审稿人1写如下这段话:
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)
Comments:
Actually, the paper has been significantly improved as some of my recommendations have been taken into considerations. However, the author ignore the most important comment. Thus, I will mention it again and he must consider it seriously.
1) Regarding the selected benchmark problems F1-18 , the author must evaluate the proposed algorithm (IWOA) on all CEC2017 benchmark problems on D=10,30,50 and 100. The number of runs is 51 for each problem in each dimension, the total function evaluations are 100000,300000,500000 and 1000000 for D=10,30,50,100.
Besides, he must compare the proposed algorithm against top-tier algorithms not basic algorithms i.e. AGDE, EAGDE, EFADE,EBLSHADE,JSO algorithms.
Please refer to the technical report
[1]N.H. Awad, M.Z. Ali, J.J. Liang, B.Y. Qu, P. N. Suganthan, “Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2017 Special Session and Competition on Single Objective Real-Parameter Numerical Optimization,” Nanyang Technological University, Jordan University of Science and Technology and Zhengzhou University, Tech. Rep., 2016.
Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: YES
Is the paper technically sound?: YES
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: partially
Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: yes

注意:其中说的AGDE, EAGDE是该审稿人在上一期审稿中提出的问题;
In the experimental section, the comparison part seems to be very limited. The authors have used only few algorithms for comparison. Two to three more recent versions of DE should be added for comparison.


小弟我实在经验不足,困惑了:
(1)文章还需要按照审稿专家1的意见修改吗?编辑不都已经给了录用了吗?
(2)如果修改,我真不知道top-tier algorithm是指哪些算法?有谁知道吗?
还请各位过来人给个指导意见
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

阿塔萨达

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
看这问题风格非常像IEEE Access的,接收之后其实不用再理会审稿人了,他就是想让你引他论文,但接收之后不能再改引用了,也不会再返回审稿人手里了,直接提交了都行
8楼2020-05-01 17:24:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

懵德尔

新虫 (小有名气)

帮顶  内容看不懂 但是没遇到这种已经通知接收还要修改的情况
4楼2020-05-01 14:51:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaochoujiao

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 懵德尔 at 2020-05-01 14:51:30
帮顶  内容看不懂 但是没遇到这种已经通知接收还要修改的情况

我后来看了论坛里一些相似的情况(都是说听编辑的,审稿人意见不用考虑),我直接提交终稿了,因为无法修改,编辑邮箱里有一句话:However, NO CHANGES to the author list or the references will be permitted.
5楼2020-05-01 15:47:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaochoujiao

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by 阿塔萨达 at 2020-05-01 17:24:31
看这问题风格非常像IEEE Access的,接收之后其实不用再理会审稿人了,他就是想让你引他论文,但接收之后不能再改引用了,也不会再返回审稿人手里了,直接提交了都行

审稿人之前给我建议的几篇文献(虽然没说让我引用,但我能感觉出来),我都引用了,唉,估计编辑都看不下去了。
9楼2020-05-01 20:24:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

yangzaoli

新虫 (正式写手)

哪个期刊?你的proposed method 是聚合算子吗?

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2020-05-01 13:56:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Messinan

铜虫 (正式写手)

3楼2020-05-01 14:28:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaochoujiao

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by Messinan at 2020-05-01 14:28:25
等待大佬解答

我后来看了论坛里一些相似的情况(都是说听编辑的,审稿人的意见不用考虑),我直接提交终稿了,因为无法修改,编辑邮箱里有一句话:However, NO CHANGES to the author list or the references will be permitted.
6楼2020-05-01 15:47:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaochoujiao

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 懵德尔 at 2020-05-01 14:51:30
帮顶  内容看不懂 但是没遇到这种已经通知接收还要修改的情况

我已经添加了审稿人1提供的几篇文献作为本文的参考文献了。唉
7楼2020-05-01 15:49:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

阿塔萨达

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by xiaochoujiao at 2020-05-01 13:24:56
审稿人之前给我建议的几篇文献(虽然没说让我引用,但我能感觉出来),我都引用了,唉,估计编辑都看不下去了。...

那你直接提交就行,根本不用理会审稿人
10楼2020-05-01 20:51:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xiaochoujiao 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 估计是周四 +3 archvillain 2026-08-18 3/150 2026-08-21 01:48 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 科研孤儿太难了 +14 我4大白菜 2026-08-20 15/750 2026-08-20 22:33 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] 言之凿凿,明天官网会通知放榜? +15 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 17/850 2026-08-20 20:35 by CaoLG
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了 +12 wuchongjun 2026-08-20 17/850 2026-08-20 20:05 by spzhao
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +18 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 23/1150 2026-08-20 17:19 by Godzela
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+3 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 12/600 2026-08-20 15:56 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 重要消息,中午系统在维护 +11 yuleib84 2026-08-18 12/600 2026-08-20 11:09 by xskun
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +14 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 15/750 2026-08-20 08:21 by sunzitan
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +11 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 13/650 2026-08-19 21:28 by aasahr
[教师之家] 为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低?主要原因有哪些? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-15 5/250 2026-08-19 20:23 by super2002521
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +4 yuleib84 2026-08-19 5/250 2026-08-19 19:52 by hhs666
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +14 布布和一二 2026-08-19 15/750 2026-08-19 18:07 by gltch
[基金申请] filecode=后面第一个是大写字母 +10 wangze12014 2026-08-14 12/600 2026-08-19 16:56 by 苦难博士
[基金申请] 快农历七夕节了,轻松一下,男人悄悄话,女施主请不要进来。 +6 Tide man 2026-08-14 7/350 2026-08-19 09:56 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +6 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 6/300 2026-08-19 08:06 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[论文投稿] 投稿咨询 +4 wwm09 2026-08-17 6/300 2026-08-18 15:36 by wwm09
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +6 angus9576 2026-08-17 11/550 2026-08-17 23:57 by angus9576
[精细化工] 招聘 金属平磨液,抛光液研发工程师 +3 小天0311 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 07:31 by H9PLUS
信息提示
请填处理意见