| 查看: 3017 | 回复: 11 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者xiaochoujiao将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
xiaochoujiao新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
登录投稿系统，发现Accept,非常高兴，但是看到发给邮件的意见，我又沉默了 已有2人参与
|
|
|
尊敬的各位大咖，小弟投递一篇文章（关于鲸鱼算法优化的），系统显示的是Accept，Accept for final submission，非常高兴，但是随后查看邮箱， Your manuscript entitled "*********** Whale Algorithm" has been accepted for publication in XXXXX. The comments of the reviewers who reviewed your manuscript are included at the foot of this letter. We ask that you make changes to your manuscript based on those comments, before uploading final files. 但是后面，发现了审稿人1写如下这段话： Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) Comments: Actually, the paper has been significantly improved as some of my recommendations have been taken into considerations. However, the author ignore the most important comment. Thus, I will mention it again and he must consider it seriously. 1) Regarding the selected benchmark problems F1-18 , the author must evaluate the proposed algorithm (IWOA) on all CEC2017 benchmark problems on D=10,30,50 and 100. The number of runs is 51 for each problem in each dimension, the total function evaluations are 100000,300000,500000 and 1000000 for D=10,30,50,100. Besides, he must compare the proposed algorithm against top-tier algorithms not basic algorithms i.e. AGDE, EAGDE, EFADE,EBLSHADE,JSO algorithms. Please refer to the technical report [1]N.H. Awad, M.Z. Ali, J.J. Liang, B.Y. Qu, P. N. Suganthan, “Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2017 Special Session and Competition on Single Objective Real-Parameter Numerical Optimization,” Nanyang Technological University, Jordan University of Science and Technology and Zhengzhou University, Tech. Rep., 2016. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: YES Is the paper technically sound?: YES Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: partially Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: yes 注意：其中说的AGDE, EAGDE是该审稿人在上一期审稿中提出的问题； In the experimental section, the comparison part seems to be very limited. The authors have used only few algorithms for comparison. Two to three more recent versions of DE should be added for comparison. 小弟我实在经验不足，困惑了： （1）文章还需要按照审稿专家1的意见修改吗？编辑不都已经给了录用了吗？ （2）如果修改，我真不知道top-tier algorithm是指哪些算法？有谁知道吗？ 还请各位过来人给个指导意见 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
伙伴们，祝我生日快乐吧
已经有22人回复
-
调剂
已经有7人回复
-
289求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿武理314求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
欢迎申博同学联系
已经有5人回复
-
288求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
国自科面上基金字体
已经有4人回复
-
梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入
已经有6人回复
-
274求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
化学调剂0703
已经有6人回复
xiaochoujiao
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 687.9
- 散金: 18
- 帖子: 272
- 在线: 27.5小时
- 虫号: 1483897
- 注册: 2011-11-09
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
6楼2020-05-01 15:47:54
2楼2020-05-01 13:56:16
3楼2020-05-01 14:28:25
4楼2020-05-01 14:51:30
20