五个审稿人，一个接收小修，三个大修，一个reject。ae意见：四个审稿人的意见应该在修改稿中提交。

dear dr. xxxxxxx:

based on the referee reports and the associate editor's recommendation, i regret to inform you that your paper cannot be accepted and have to be rejected.  we hope that the attached reviews are useful to you in your research. if the reviewers have attached a pdf or text file review, you will need to retrieve it from your author center. therefore, please check the author center for more information when appropriate.

in view of the reviews and recommendation of the associate editor, we would like to encourage you to revise the manuscript thoroughly to address the issues raised by the reviewers/associate editor and resubmit the revised version as a new submission when ready along with the paper id as well as your specific responses to the reviewers.

thank you for submitting to the ieee transactions on cybernetics.

sincerely,
xxxx

referee: 1     recommendation: reject
summary of evaluation: poor
organization: 1
clarity: 2
length: 3
references: 1
correctness: 2
significance: 1
originality: 1
attachments:
if survey coverage: 2
contribution: 1

referee: 2  recommendation: prepare a major revision
summary of evaluation: good
organization: 4
clarity: 3
length: 3
references: 4
correctness: 4
significance: 3
originality: 3
attachments: 3
if survey coverage: 3
contribution: 3

referee: 3
recommendation: accept with minor changes
summary of evaluation: good
organization: 4
clarity: 5
length: 3
references: 4
correctness: 4
significance: 4
originality: 4
attachments: 4
if survey coverage: 3
contribution: 3

referee: 4
recommendation: prepare a major revision
summary of evaluation: good
organization: 5
clarity: 4
length: 3
references: 4
correctness: 4
significance: 4
originality: 4
attachments: 4
if survey coverage: 5
contribution: 4

referee: 5 recommendation: prepare a major revision
summary of evaluation: fair
organization: 4
clarity: 3
length: 3
references: 3
correctness: 4
significance: 3
originality: 3
attachments: 4
if survey coverage: 3
contribution: 3，

楼主多久得到审稿结果？

大修是major revised

wang当主编时是有一个reject结果就是reject，现在主编换成了chen，从他当SMC时主编时的风格来讲，好好修改很有希望。

Wang当主编时，我两小修，一个reject，直接毙了。你这个已经很好了

祝福