请问怎么理解编辑的拒稿理由——不符合本杂志主题
上周投了energy&fuels,主要是反应动力学研究。处理的副主编是H. Scott Fogler,一位反应动力学研究方面的大牛。昨晚收到他的回复 :
After my review of your manuscript, it is my judgment that your paper is outside the scope of Energy & Fuels and we will not be able to consider it further. We must make decisions based on likely scientific impact and interest to our readership. This manuscript would be better suited to a journal such as Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
他竟然建议投IECR,这个难度更大啊!我感觉不是我不符合主题,是不是编辑委婉地说文章质量不够呢?
However, ACS Publications is pleased to provide an opportunity to submit your manuscript to ACS Omega. The editors at ACS Omega encourage you to consider any recommendations received from the editor at Energy & Fuels. To have your manuscript files and information copied to a new submission for ACS Omega, please see the information below. The editors at ACS Omega will evaluate your revised manuscript from a fresh perspective. Please note that submitting your manuscript to ACS Omega does not guarantee acceptance.
后面他推荐了ACS Omega,我查了下,是新开的收费期刊。
各位虫友怎么看?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这种一般都是文章档次达不到,祝好,楼主。
我也是这种回复,你的档次不够,或者方向不够吸引人
不适合有很多方面
比如,确实内容不适合期刊,语言不过关,编辑感觉创新不够,还有就是编辑不识货
,
都是借口。
编辑对你的论文没有兴趣,具体原因就不好猜测了。
那就试试IECR吧,万一呢。坚决不投OA期刊