请问这两个审稿意见怎么样?CCC的
Reviewer #1: The topic is interesting and novel and the paper seems very complete concerning the number/quality of experimental tests performed to characterize the material. The work has potential for possible publication but the following aspects deserve answer/clarification:
Reviewer #2: This article continues the series of author′s scientific work focused on the halloysite.
The characteristics of the used halloysite and experimental methods are described in detail in the introduction of the experimental chapter.
The results of individual measurements are described in detail, and they are discussed extensively at the end of the experimental chapter.
There are no serious errors in the article. Recommendation: Publish after revision according to Comments to authors.
二审被拒的概率大不大
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这意见算是高度评价,肯定没问题,不用担心。
谢谢支持,如果接收了回来散金币,记得来拿哦
,
问题不大,好好改改,加油
中国控制大会?没听说过会议拒稿的
祝顺利
认真答就行了,感觉问题不大