本人今天收到通知，一篇SCI需要小修，但有几个审稿意见不清楚该如何处理，因此上来求助各位兄弟姐妹。
（1）Usually, the Abstract section should be devoted to a brief description of what has done in the presented article, without anticipating the conclusions (that should be listed in the "Conclusions section&quot. Conversely, except for the first sentence, the Abstract seems to be only the Conclusion section. The reviewer suggests to completely rewrite the Abstract section in order to explain just what the authors did during their investigations, leaving the conclusions to the following sections.

（2）The keywords should be reviewed, they seems to be not effective.

（3）The authors have claimed that the similarity ratios are determined according to the main theorems of similarity theory. Could you prove this claim by providing relevant mathematical relations?

（1）专家认为“摘要部分应该是对文章内容的简要描述，而不是预先得出结论”，建议我重写摘要。但我阅读的文献中，大部分都将分析得到的结果写入摘要中了，何况我的摘要中已经对分析的结果进行了简化。请问如果要重写一般怎么处理？如果不重写摘要，该如何回答？

（2）专家提出我的关键词似乎是无效的，请问这个如何界定？

（3）专家提出要我用数学关系论述“相似比是根据相似理论确定的”，但这个问题在模型试验中是大家都遵循的，如果用数学关系论述需要花费大量篇幅，不太现实。请问这种大家已经使用的很成熟的理论该如何跟专家表述？

还望大家不吝赐教，多谢了 返回小木虫查看更多