| ²é¿´: 1113 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßlznosmile½«ÔùËÍÄú 5 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÇóÖú£ºÕªÒªÐ´×÷ºÍÎÞЧ¹Ø¼ü´Ê
|
||
|
±¾È˽ñÌìÊÕµ½Í¨Öª£¬Ò»ÆªSCIÐèҪСÐÞ£¬µ«Óм¸¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û²»Çå³þ¸ÃÈçºÎ´¦Àí£¬Òò´ËÉÏÀ´ÇóÖú¸÷λÐֵܽãÃᣠ£¨1£©Usually, the Abstract section should be devoted to a brief description of what has done in the presented article, without anticipating the conclusions (that should be listed in the "Conclusions section" . Conversely, except for the first sentence, the Abstract seems to be only the Conclusion section. The reviewer suggests to completely rewrite the Abstract section in order to explain just what the authors did during their investigations, leaving the conclusions to the following sections. £¨2£©The keywords should be reviewed, they seems to be not effective. £¨3£©The authors have claimed that the similarity ratios are determined according to the main theorems of similarity theory. Could you prove this claim by providing relevant mathematical relations? £¨1£©×¨¼ÒÈÏΪ¡°ÕªÒª²¿·ÖÓ¦¸ÃÊǶÔÎÄÕÂÄÚÈݵļòÒªÃèÊö£¬¶ø²»ÊÇÔ¤Ïȵóö½áÂÛ¡±£¬½¨ÒéÎÒÖØÐ´ÕªÒª¡£µ«ÎÒÔĶÁµÄÎÄÏ×ÖУ¬´ó²¿·Ö¶¼½«·ÖÎöµÃµ½µÄ½á¹ûдÈëÕªÒªÖÐÁË£¬ºÎ¿öÎÒµÄÕªÒªÖÐÒѾ¶Ô·ÖÎöµÄ½á¹û½øÐÐÁ˼ò»¯¡£ÇëÎÊÈç¹ûÒªÖØÐ´Ò»°ãÔõô´¦Àí£¿Èç¹û²»ÖØÐ´ÕªÒª£¬¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ð£¿ £¨2£©×¨¼ÒÌá³öÎҵĹؼü´ÊËÆºõÊÇÎÞЧµÄ£¬ÇëÎÊÕâ¸öÈçºÎ½ç¶¨£¿ £¨3£©×¨¼ÒÌá³öÒªÎÒÓÃÊýѧ¹ØÏµÂÛÊö¡°ÏàËÆ±ÈÊǸù¾ÝÏàËÆÀíÂÛÈ·¶¨µÄ¡±£¬µ«Õâ¸öÎÊÌâÔÚÄ£ÐÍÊÔÑéÖÐÊÇ´ó¼Ò¶¼×ñѵģ¬Èç¹ûÓÃÊýѧ¹ØÏµÂÛÊöÐèÒª»¨·Ñ´óÁ¿Æª·ù£¬²»Ì«ÏÖʵ¡£ÇëÎÊÕâÖÖ´ó¼ÒÒѾʹÓõĺܳÉÊìµÄÀíÂÛ¸ÃÈçºÎ¸úר¼Ò±íÊö£¿ »¹Íû´ó¼Ò²»Áߴͽ̣¬¶àлÁË |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8 O5 51O 54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
foodedit
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2982.2
- Ìû×Ó: 193
- ÔÚÏß: 52.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 20275722
- ×¢²á: 2019-12-26
- רҵ: ʳƷ¿ÆÑ§»ù´¡
|
¹ØÓÚ1£¬ÕªÒªÖ»·Å×îÖØÒª¡¢ÎüÒýÈ˵Ľá¹û£»ÕªÒªÖ÷Òª°üÀ¨×öʲô£¬Ôõô×ö£¬µÃµ½Ê²Ã´£¬ÒâÒå¡£½¨ÒéÐÞ¸ÄÉÙÐí£¬ÊµÔÚûµÃ¸Ä£¬¿ÉÒÔ˵˵ÄãΪʲôÕâôдժҪ¡£¹ØÓÚ2£¬¹Ø¼ü´Ê×îºÃÓÐÀ´Ô´ÓÚÕªÒªºÍÌâÄ¿£¬ÄÜ·´Ó³Äã×öµÄÄÚÈÝ£¬½¨Òé¸Ä¼¸¸ö£»¹ØÓÚ3£¬°ÑÄãΪʲôÓÃÕâ¸ö·½·¨µÄÀíÓɲûÊöÒ»±é¡£ ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
2Â¥2020-02-09 21:42:18
3Â¥2020-02-09 22:39:52
4Â¥2020-02-10 08:53:38













. Conversely, except for the first sentence, the Abstract seems to be only the Conclusion section. The reviewer suggests to completely rewrite the Abstract section in order to explain just what the authors did during their investigations, leaving the conclusions to the following sections.
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥