| 查看: 1104 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者lznosmile将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
审稿意见求助:摘要写作和无效关键词
|
||
|
本人今天收到通知,一篇SCI需要小修,但有几个审稿意见不清楚该如何处理,因此上来求助各位兄弟姐妹。 (1)Usually, the Abstract section should be devoted to a brief description of what has done in the presented article, without anticipating the conclusions (that should be listed in the "Conclusions section" . Conversely, except for the first sentence, the Abstract seems to be only the Conclusion section. The reviewer suggests to completely rewrite the Abstract section in order to explain just what the authors did during their investigations, leaving the conclusions to the following sections. (2)The keywords should be reviewed, they seems to be not effective. (3)The authors have claimed that the similarity ratios are determined according to the main theorems of similarity theory. Could you prove this claim by providing relevant mathematical relations? (1)专家认为“摘要部分应该是对文章内容的简要描述,而不是预先得出结论”,建议我重写摘要。但我阅读的文献中,大部分都将分析得到的结果写入摘要中了,何况我的摘要中已经对分析的结果进行了简化。请问如果要重写一般怎么处理?如果不重写摘要,该如何回答? (2)专家提出我的关键词似乎是无效的,请问这个如何界定? (3)专家提出要我用数学关系论述“相似比是根据相似理论确定的”,但这个问题在模型试验中是大家都遵循的,如果用数学关系论述需要花费大量篇幅,不太现实。请问这种大家已经使用的很成熟的理论该如何跟专家表述? 还望大家不吝赐教,多谢了 |
» 猜你喜欢
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有5人回复
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有6人回复
免疫学博士有名额,速联系
已经有7人回复
多组分精馏求助
已经有5人回复
交叉科学部支持青年基金,对三无青椒是个机会吗?
已经有7人回复
青椒八年已不青,大家都被折磨成啥样了?
已经有15人回复
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小?
已经有6人回复
Fe3O4@SiO2合成
已经有6人回复
3楼2020-02-09 22:39:52
|
关于1,摘要只放最重要、吸引人的结果;摘要主要包括做什么,怎么做,得到什么,意义。建议修改少许,实在没得改,可以说说你为什么这么写摘要。关于2,关键词最好有来源于摘要和题目,能反映你做的内容,建议改几个;关于3,把你为什么用这个方法的理由阐述一遍。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
2楼2020-02-09 21:42:18
4楼2020-02-10 08:53:38













. Conversely, except for the first sentence, the Abstract seems to be only the Conclusion section. The reviewer suggests to completely rewrite the Abstract section in order to explain just what the authors did during their investigations, leaving the conclusions to the following sections.
回复此楼