| ²é¿´: 1130 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßlznosmile½«ÔùËÍÄú 5 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÇóÖú£ºÕªÒªÐ´×÷ºÍÎÞЧ¹Ø¼ü´Ê
|
||
|
±¾È˽ñÌìÊÕµ½Í¨Öª£¬Ò»ÆªSCIÐèҪСÐÞ£¬µ«Óм¸¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û²»Çå³þ¸ÃÈçºÎ´¦Àí£¬Òò´ËÉÏÀ´ÇóÖú¸÷λÐֵܽãÃᣠ£¨1£©Usually, the Abstract section should be devoted to a brief description of what has done in the presented article, without anticipating the conclusions (that should be listed in the "Conclusions section" . Conversely, except for the first sentence, the Abstract seems to be only the Conclusion section. The reviewer suggests to completely rewrite the Abstract section in order to explain just what the authors did during their investigations, leaving the conclusions to the following sections. £¨2£©The keywords should be reviewed, they seems to be not effective. £¨3£©The authors have claimed that the similarity ratios are determined according to the main theorems of similarity theory. Could you prove this claim by providing relevant mathematical relations? £¨1£©×¨¼ÒÈÏΪ¡°ÕªÒª²¿·ÖÓ¦¸ÃÊǶÔÎÄÕÂÄÚÈݵļòÒªÃèÊö£¬¶ø²»ÊÇÔ¤Ïȵóö½áÂÛ¡±£¬½¨ÒéÎÒÖØÐ´ÕªÒª¡£µ«ÎÒÔĶÁµÄÎÄÏ×ÖУ¬´ó²¿·Ö¶¼½«·ÖÎöµÃµ½µÄ½á¹ûдÈëÕªÒªÖÐÁË£¬ºÎ¿öÎÒµÄÕªÒªÖÐÒѾ¶Ô·ÖÎöµÄ½á¹û½øÐÐÁ˼ò»¯¡£ÇëÎÊÈç¹ûÒªÖØÐ´Ò»°ãÔõô´¦Àí£¿Èç¹û²»ÖØÐ´ÕªÒª£¬¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ð£¿ £¨2£©×¨¼ÒÌá³öÎҵĹؼü´ÊËÆºõÊÇÎÞЧµÄ£¬ÇëÎÊÕâ¸öÈçºÎ½ç¶¨£¿ £¨3£©×¨¼ÒÌá³öÒªÎÒÓÃÊýѧ¹ØÏµÂÛÊö¡°ÏàËÆ±ÈÊǸù¾ÝÏàËÆÀíÂÛÈ·¶¨µÄ¡±£¬µ«Õâ¸öÎÊÌâÔÚÄ£ÐÍÊÔÑéÖÐÊÇ´ó¼Ò¶¼×ñѵģ¬Èç¹ûÓÃÊýѧ¹ØÏµÂÛÊöÐèÒª»¨·Ñ´óÁ¿Æª·ù£¬²»Ì«ÏÖʵ¡£ÇëÎÊÕâÖÖ´ó¼ÒÒѾʹÓõĺܳÉÊìµÄÀíÂÛ¸ÃÈçºÎ¸úר¼Ò±íÊö£¿ »¹Íû´ó¼Ò²»Áߴͽ̣¬¶àлÁË |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á£¬Çó¸÷λÀÏʦÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
315Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤´ó²ÄÁÏ324·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶323Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
331Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0703Óлú»¯Ñ§
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¶«»ªÀí¹¤´óѧ»¯²Äרҵ26½ì˶ʿ²©Ê¿ÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
266Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤275Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
µÚÒ»Ö¾Ô¸ÉϺ£´óѧ£¬×¨Òµ»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬×Ü·Ö288£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
4Â¥2020-02-10 08:53:38
foodedit
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2982.2
- Ìû×Ó: 193
- ÔÚÏß: 52.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 20275722
- ×¢²á: 2019-12-26
- רҵ: ʳƷ¿ÆÑ§»ù´¡
|
¹ØÓÚ1£¬ÕªÒªÖ»·Å×îÖØÒª¡¢ÎüÒýÈ˵Ľá¹û£»ÕªÒªÖ÷Òª°üÀ¨×öʲô£¬Ôõô×ö£¬µÃµ½Ê²Ã´£¬ÒâÒå¡£½¨ÒéÐÞ¸ÄÉÙÐí£¬ÊµÔÚûµÃ¸Ä£¬¿ÉÒÔ˵˵ÄãΪʲôÕâôдժҪ¡£¹ØÓÚ2£¬¹Ø¼ü´Ê×îºÃÓÐÀ´Ô´ÓÚÕªÒªºÍÌâÄ¿£¬ÄÜ·´Ó³Äã×öµÄÄÚÈÝ£¬½¨Òé¸Ä¼¸¸ö£»¹ØÓÚ3£¬°ÑÄãΪʲôÓÃÕâ¸ö·½·¨µÄÀíÓɲûÊöÒ»±é¡£ ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
2Â¥2020-02-09 21:42:18
3Â¥2020-02-09 22:39:52













. Conversely, except for the first sentence, the Abstract seems to be only the Conclusion section. The reviewer suggests to completely rewrite the Abstract section in order to explain just what the authors did during their investigations, leaving the conclusions to the following sections.
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20