可行性证明,大神帮忙看看怎么修改
大神帮忙看看怎么修改。 退修由几点意见不太清楚如何修改,都是要求补充可行性论证,不知道什么意思,已经在论文中提供了可用性证明
in case we thought about the attacker as the host side, how would we update its protocol stack?
Another concern is related to encapsulating Attribute Identifier (AID) in each packet to ingress and egress the network. What would be the overhead over the network due to this?
Also, the solution modifies 802.1x protocol and extended the OpenFlow protocol...would that be practical if we consider this approach as the solution the unauthenticated access to the SDN network problem?
Finally, there is a minimum of two switches needed authentication and forwarding switches,...would that solution be scalable?
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
第一次投computer security,没有经验,自己表述不清楚,对不住大家。但是需要这样冷嘲热讽吗,不愿意解答就算了,这说话带刺什么意思
,
就是一个问题中practical,需要补充哪方面内容。还有可扩展性怎么回答,是论述极限性能还是哪方面