投稿advanced materials technologies大修然后只给了10天时间，正常么？
Please note that reviewers may not be numbered consecutively. Where reviewers have provided additional files, these are available here:
EVALUATION:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Please rate the importance of this submission.
Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal
Reviewer #2: Should be published in this journal
Reviewer #3: Should be published in this journal
--------------------
Please rate the originality of this submission.
Reviewer #1: Acceptable level of new results
Reviewer #2: Acceptable level of new results
Reviewer #3: Acceptable level of new results
--------------------
Please rate the scientific and technical content of this submission.
Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies
Reviewer #2: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies
Reviewer #3: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies-
Please rate the length of this submission.
Reviewer #1: Concise and correct length
Reviewer #2: Concise and correct length
Reviewer #3: Concise and correct length
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
reviewer #1:
in this manuscript, the authors report … the device was used to detect the human activities. overall, this manuscript was suitable performed and can be accepted for publication in "advanced materials technologies" after consideration of the following detailed points:
提了四个意见，