Please note that reviewers may not be numbered consecutively. Where reviewers have provided additional files, these are available here:

EVALUATION:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Please rate the importance of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal

Reviewer #2: Should be published in this journal

Reviewer #3: Should be published in this journal

--------------------

Please rate the originality of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Acceptable level of new results

Reviewer #2: Acceptable level of new results

Reviewer #3: Acceptable level of new results

--------------------

Please rate the scientific and technical content of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies

Reviewer #2: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies

Reviewer #3: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies-

Please rate the length of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Concise and correct length

Reviewer #2: Concise and correct length

Reviewer #3: Concise and correct length

 返回小木虫查看更多