3个月给一审意见，一共12条，发现全是问题，咋个改啊？
reviewer1：
There are some comments as follows.
1. For better readability, authors should introduce the status and motivation of this work, and summarize with a paragraph about this paper.
2. Equations should end with a comma or a period depending on their position within a sentence and denote with equation number.
3. Please enhance reasonable analyses and discussions for experimental results.
4. The article should present the limitations of the work and directions for future research in the conclusion, which means the conclusions section should be further enhanced.
5. Please ensure that the references are correct and in compliance with the ###'s style.
reviewer2：
The detailed comments are as follows.
1.        Please prepare and revise the manuscript according to the paper template of ###.
2.        The paper writing needs to be improved and polished. There are some sentences that are grammatically incorrect and too long to comprehend. The authors should ask a native English spoken person to proof read the manuscript.
3.        The authors should compare the proposed work to other relevant works in detail. There is a need for this manuscript to differentiate itself from the related works.
4.        In order to point out the technical contribution of the paper, please summarize the technical achievements of this work in the Introduction section.
5.        For better readability and comprehensibility, please highlight the key research problem of this work clearly.
6.        All of equations should end with a comma or period according to their position within a sentence. Please recheck them completely.
7.        Please ensure that all references in the Reference list are in compliance the reference format of ### and are cited in the text and vice versa.
 返回小木虫查看更多